The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete the minimum stanrard to keep articles is GNG. The cricket inclusion standards are a bunch of rubbish and have been over and over again been shown to not at all predict actual passing of GNG. This article very clearly fails the multiple significant prong of GNG.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
20:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete the minimum stanrard to keep articles is GNG. The cricket inclusion standards are a bunch of rubbish and have been over and over again been shown to not at all predict actual passing of GNG. This article very clearly fails the multiple significant prong of GNG.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
20:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.