The result was delete. The reasons given for keeping are "Subject is notable", "The subject of the article is obviously notable"; both without any indication why; "A notable social media personality who is mentioned in the same breathe as MrBeast, Patrick Bet-David, Dan Bilzerian, Dixie D'Amelio, Paul Logan, etc", but notability is not inherited from other notable people merely because one is mentioned together with them (I am sure I have sometimes been mentioned in the same sentence as notable people, but I am not notable); "Notable as an online personality and influencer and falls into that category"; "The subject seems notable enough", again without any indication why; "His online presence alone is good enough for a Wikipedia page"; I am not personally the greatest fan of the current notability guidelines, and I think there is a case for including "online presence" in the guidelines, but at present that is not so; "His notability is uncontestable", well, several people have contested it; "Coupled with the businesses he founded", which I can only assume means that we should regard notability as inherited from a business ot its founder, but we don't; "Page should stay", again without any indication why. Not a single one of those addresses Wikipedia's notability guidelines, so we have no policy compliant reasons for "keep" at all. JBW ( talk) 22:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Doesn't pass WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NCREATIVE, or WP:ENTERTAINER. None of the sources are all these three things at the same time: (1) independent of the subject, (2) reliable, (3) in-depth in terms of coverage. The person may have had some unspecified roles in some productions (World's Greatest Social Stars, Top 25!, etc.) but there is no evidence that these are significant productions and there is no evidence that these were significant roles. There is some coverage of a thing associated with the subject called "monk mode". Coverage of that is not meaningful in terms of sources useful for establishing notability either. The person has not made "unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment" and is not "known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique". His YouTube channel, TikTok and other online presences are not encyclopedically relevant at all. — Alalch E. 12:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
it can be worked upon in order to improve its quality. — Alalch E. 08:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
his notability is uncontestable, how did I fail to notice this... sheesh, I really need to remember to refer to the list of uncontestably notable influencers every time I start an AfD. — Alalch E. 10:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
"How Is This 21-Year-Old Entrepreneur Making Millions On YouTube ?". MYCOMEUP Magazine. 2021-04-26. Retrieved 2023-11-22. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Iman Gadzhi - From High School Drop Out To Founder Of The World's Largest Education Company". Inspiring Startups. 2020-07-01. Retrieved 2023-11-18. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Iman Gadzhi: Joe Rogan Wannabe Or Future Industry Disrupter?". Sir Thorney. 2022-09-01. Retrieved 2023-11-23. | ![]() |
![]() |
~ bit harder to evaluate this source on whether it consists of promotion | ✘ No |
"Iman Gadzhi Shares His Incredible Story Of Making $25 Million By 22 And Building 5 Schools In Nepal". OK Magazine. 2022-09-25. Retrieved 2023-11-22. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Iman Gadzhi (@realimangadzhi) Official". TikTok. Retrieved 2023-11-18. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Meet Iman Gadzhi: Millionaire Agency Owner". Grow Your Agency. 2019-03-04. Retrieved 2023-11-22. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"The Journey of Iman Gadzhi: A Blueprint for a Sigma Male". Eternobody Fitness. Retrieved 2023-11-22. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"How To Sign A Client With Iman Gadzhi". MYCOMEUP Magazine. 2021-08-23. Retrieved 2023-11-22. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Youtuber Iman Gadzhi Shares 7 Ways to Make $10,000 A Month In 2023". Tlux Media. 2023-02-07. Retrieved 2023-11-19. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"What Is The 'Monk Mode' Trend On TikTok?". Indy100. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"The People Going 'Monk Mode' To Limit Social Media Use". BBC News. 2023-10-01. Retrieved 2023-11-23. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"I'm a CEO Who Tried 'Monk Mode' After Seeing It On TikTok. It Took A Month To Get Used To But Now My Productivity Is 5 Times Better". Business Insider. Retrieved 2023-11-23. | ![]() |
~ WP:BUSINESSINSIDER; interview with another individual ("This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Josh Wood, the 32-year-old CEO and founder of the tech hospitality company Bloc, ..."), not reliable for claims about Gadzhi | ![]() |
✘ No |
World's Greatest Social Stars! Top 25 (TV Series 2015–2020) 6.8 | Reality-TV, retrieved 2023-11-19 | ~ can't know | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Iman Gadzhi's Filmography (Internet Celeb, Actor, Entrepreneur)". Iman Gadzhi Filmography. Retrieved 2023-11-19. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Kings of the Internet (TV Series 2022– ) 4.7 | Action, News, Reality-TV, retrieved 2023-11-19 | ~ can't know | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Wie is Iman Gadzhi? - The Ecom Agency". theecomagency.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved 2023-11-19. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"'Cape Town Is SO cheap, I struggle To Spend $30k a month,' Says Russian Tycoon, Iman Gadzhi". CapeTalk. Retrieved 2023-11-18. | ~ could be sponsored content | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Unveiling Iman Gadzhi's Luxurious $10,800 Home Gym". Gym Nirvana. 2023-11-15. Retrieved 2023-11-19. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"LOOK: Russian tycoon says he STRUGGLES to spend R500k per month in Cape Town". The South African. 2022-10-03. Retrieved 2023-11-18. | ![]() |
~ this website is a mainstream South African online WP:NEWSORG, but not all of their articles are journalistic and many are tabloid-like; this article calls Gadzhi a "Russian tycoon" which is obviously false | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. The reasons given for keeping are "Subject is notable", "The subject of the article is obviously notable"; both without any indication why; "A notable social media personality who is mentioned in the same breathe as MrBeast, Patrick Bet-David, Dan Bilzerian, Dixie D'Amelio, Paul Logan, etc", but notability is not inherited from other notable people merely because one is mentioned together with them (I am sure I have sometimes been mentioned in the same sentence as notable people, but I am not notable); "Notable as an online personality and influencer and falls into that category"; "The subject seems notable enough", again without any indication why; "His online presence alone is good enough for a Wikipedia page"; I am not personally the greatest fan of the current notability guidelines, and I think there is a case for including "online presence" in the guidelines, but at present that is not so; "His notability is uncontestable", well, several people have contested it; "Coupled with the businesses he founded", which I can only assume means that we should regard notability as inherited from a business ot its founder, but we don't; "Page should stay", again without any indication why. Not a single one of those addresses Wikipedia's notability guidelines, so we have no policy compliant reasons for "keep" at all. JBW ( talk) 22:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Doesn't pass WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NCREATIVE, or WP:ENTERTAINER. None of the sources are all these three things at the same time: (1) independent of the subject, (2) reliable, (3) in-depth in terms of coverage. The person may have had some unspecified roles in some productions (World's Greatest Social Stars, Top 25!, etc.) but there is no evidence that these are significant productions and there is no evidence that these were significant roles. There is some coverage of a thing associated with the subject called "monk mode". Coverage of that is not meaningful in terms of sources useful for establishing notability either. The person has not made "unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment" and is not "known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique". His YouTube channel, TikTok and other online presences are not encyclopedically relevant at all. — Alalch E. 12:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
it can be worked upon in order to improve its quality. — Alalch E. 08:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
his notability is uncontestable, how did I fail to notice this... sheesh, I really need to remember to refer to the list of uncontestably notable influencers every time I start an AfD. — Alalch E. 10:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
"How Is This 21-Year-Old Entrepreneur Making Millions On YouTube ?". MYCOMEUP Magazine. 2021-04-26. Retrieved 2023-11-22. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Iman Gadzhi - From High School Drop Out To Founder Of The World's Largest Education Company". Inspiring Startups. 2020-07-01. Retrieved 2023-11-18. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Iman Gadzhi: Joe Rogan Wannabe Or Future Industry Disrupter?". Sir Thorney. 2022-09-01. Retrieved 2023-11-23. | ![]() |
![]() |
~ bit harder to evaluate this source on whether it consists of promotion | ✘ No |
"Iman Gadzhi Shares His Incredible Story Of Making $25 Million By 22 And Building 5 Schools In Nepal". OK Magazine. 2022-09-25. Retrieved 2023-11-22. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Iman Gadzhi (@realimangadzhi) Official". TikTok. Retrieved 2023-11-18. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Meet Iman Gadzhi: Millionaire Agency Owner". Grow Your Agency. 2019-03-04. Retrieved 2023-11-22. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"The Journey of Iman Gadzhi: A Blueprint for a Sigma Male". Eternobody Fitness. Retrieved 2023-11-22. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"How To Sign A Client With Iman Gadzhi". MYCOMEUP Magazine. 2021-08-23. Retrieved 2023-11-22. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Youtuber Iman Gadzhi Shares 7 Ways to Make $10,000 A Month In 2023". Tlux Media. 2023-02-07. Retrieved 2023-11-19. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"What Is The 'Monk Mode' Trend On TikTok?". Indy100. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"The People Going 'Monk Mode' To Limit Social Media Use". BBC News. 2023-10-01. Retrieved 2023-11-23. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"I'm a CEO Who Tried 'Monk Mode' After Seeing It On TikTok. It Took A Month To Get Used To But Now My Productivity Is 5 Times Better". Business Insider. Retrieved 2023-11-23. | ![]() |
~ WP:BUSINESSINSIDER; interview with another individual ("This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Josh Wood, the 32-year-old CEO and founder of the tech hospitality company Bloc, ..."), not reliable for claims about Gadzhi | ![]() |
✘ No |
World's Greatest Social Stars! Top 25 (TV Series 2015–2020) 6.8 | Reality-TV, retrieved 2023-11-19 | ~ can't know | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Iman Gadzhi's Filmography (Internet Celeb, Actor, Entrepreneur)". Iman Gadzhi Filmography. Retrieved 2023-11-19. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Kings of the Internet (TV Series 2022– ) 4.7 | Action, News, Reality-TV, retrieved 2023-11-19 | ~ can't know | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Wie is Iman Gadzhi? - The Ecom Agency". theecomagency.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved 2023-11-19. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"'Cape Town Is SO cheap, I struggle To Spend $30k a month,' Says Russian Tycoon, Iman Gadzhi". CapeTalk. Retrieved 2023-11-18. | ~ could be sponsored content | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Unveiling Iman Gadzhi's Luxurious $10,800 Home Gym". Gym Nirvana. 2023-11-15. Retrieved 2023-11-19. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"LOOK: Russian tycoon says he STRUGGLES to spend R500k per month in Cape Town". The South African. 2022-10-03. Retrieved 2023-11-18. | ![]() |
~ this website is a mainstream South African online WP:NEWSORG, but not all of their articles are journalistic and many are tabloid-like; this article calls Gadzhi a "Russian tycoon" which is obviously false | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |