The result was delete. Notability is intentionally not the same standard as "famous" or "well known". So while Unzu may be will known in Spain, there has not yet been adequate sourcing to demonstrate that he is notable. Of course if more sourcing comes in the future this may change. But for now there is a consensus to delete this article. Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable individual fails WP:GNG, Lacking significant coverage from reliable resources. Must be speedy. NarangD ( talk) 06:50, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Iker Unzu is very well known in Spanish-speaking countries. Although in Spain there is not much attention or awareness given to content creators (specifically YouTube or TikTok) based on how large his audience is worldwide, their notableness can be confirmed. There are not many articles that talk about him specifically for that reason and because he is a minor. 17:23, 14 October 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.10.153.144 ( talk)
Hello NarangD. It is normal, I will try to explain a little my reasons to prove relevance. I think we are facing a case similar to others we had in the past, such as "El Rubius" or "PewDiePie". They are celebrities, they do not have many more merits to their credit than being popular through new media that in many cases have nothing to do with traditional popularity. The article is brief, I limited myself in its day to creating something drinkable but with references, since I saw that it had been already deleted 3 times until my creation. Since then, this article has received lots of visits (although I know this does not credit any relevance, but it is the most visited article by far of those I have created).
Hello again NarangD, I made some edits and added some more references I found about Iker, these might help to prove his notability. Emmacham ( talk) 20:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete Regardless of the reasons mentioned above, WP:GNG has not been demonstrated. – The Grid ( talk) 20:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment :I can see the references you provided, are not meeting the Wikipedia's notability criteria that they can justify the notability of the subject. For more please wait for other editor's comments here. NarangD ( talk) 02:11, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
The tweets talked about the article from flooxer, but no new articles. They did talk about Unzu tho before adding the link to the article... I don't know if that prooves something. I'll search for more on the web in case it doesn't. Emmacham (talk) 08:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Notability is intentionally not the same standard as "famous" or "well known". So while Unzu may be will known in Spain, there has not yet been adequate sourcing to demonstrate that he is notable. Of course if more sourcing comes in the future this may change. But for now there is a consensus to delete this article. Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable individual fails WP:GNG, Lacking significant coverage from reliable resources. Must be speedy. NarangD ( talk) 06:50, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Iker Unzu is very well known in Spanish-speaking countries. Although in Spain there is not much attention or awareness given to content creators (specifically YouTube or TikTok) based on how large his audience is worldwide, their notableness can be confirmed. There are not many articles that talk about him specifically for that reason and because he is a minor. 17:23, 14 October 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.10.153.144 ( talk)
Hello NarangD. It is normal, I will try to explain a little my reasons to prove relevance. I think we are facing a case similar to others we had in the past, such as "El Rubius" or "PewDiePie". They are celebrities, they do not have many more merits to their credit than being popular through new media that in many cases have nothing to do with traditional popularity. The article is brief, I limited myself in its day to creating something drinkable but with references, since I saw that it had been already deleted 3 times until my creation. Since then, this article has received lots of visits (although I know this does not credit any relevance, but it is the most visited article by far of those I have created).
Hello again NarangD, I made some edits and added some more references I found about Iker, these might help to prove his notability. Emmacham ( talk) 20:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete Regardless of the reasons mentioned above, WP:GNG has not been demonstrated. – The Grid ( talk) 20:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment :I can see the references you provided, are not meeting the Wikipedia's notability criteria that they can justify the notability of the subject. For more please wait for other editor's comments here. NarangD ( talk) 02:11, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
The tweets talked about the article from flooxer, but no new articles. They did talk about Unzu tho before adding the link to the article... I don't know if that prooves something. I'll search for more on the web in case it doesn't. Emmacham (talk) 08:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)