The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (
WP:NPASR). Closing as no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination, because 1) the first keep !vote does not provide sources to qualify the assertion of modest notability, and 2) the second keep !vote only provides one source (which they added to the article). Multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable sources are required to establish notability. (
Non-administrator closure)
NorthAmerica1000 00:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep we do not delete articles that need cleanup. He seems to be an international touring entertainer of some modest notability.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 16:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep added a reference to support notability.
Inwind (
talk) 08:13, 8 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 15:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 15:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (
WP:NPASR). Closing as no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination, because 1) the first keep !vote does not provide sources to qualify the assertion of modest notability, and 2) the second keep !vote only provides one source (which they added to the article). Multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable sources are required to establish notability. (
Non-administrator closure)
NorthAmerica1000 00:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep we do not delete articles that need cleanup. He seems to be an international touring entertainer of some modest notability.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 16:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep added a reference to support notability.
Inwind (
talk) 08:13, 8 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 15:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 15:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.