- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 03:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
INtelligent Data Understanding System
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- INtelligent Data Understanding System ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD declined on the grounds that sources were found to confirm it exists. It does indeed. However, these are not independent and I can find no evidence this is a notable initiative. StarM 17:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Tagged for notability since the tail end of 2009. – Cupper52 Discuss! 18:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 03:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
INtelligent Data Understanding System
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- INtelligent Data Understanding System ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD declined on the grounds that sources were found to confirm it exists. It does indeed. However, these are not independent and I can find no evidence this is a notable initiative. StarM 17:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Tagged for notability since the tail end of 2009. – Cupper52 Discuss! 18:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.