The result was Speedy Keep - bad faith nomination. ++ Lar: t/ c 19:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Okay. It is time for the silliness to end. I have edited under an IP for a while, and under a UN for a few days. It has already slapped me in the face how unencyclopedic and petty these MBTI articles have become. Most of them are full of partial copyright violations from type sites and the listcruft of 'xxxx people in history' that accumulates is unbelievable and often unsourced. Redirect all to the main MBTI page. Wikipedia is not psychological counselling, nor is it a place for pseudoscience. Polmorry ( talk) 14:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC) reply
206.248.128.5 ( talk) 04:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Keep - bad faith nomination. ++ Lar: t/ c 19:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Okay. It is time for the silliness to end. I have edited under an IP for a while, and under a UN for a few days. It has already slapped me in the face how unencyclopedic and petty these MBTI articles have become. Most of them are full of partial copyright violations from type sites and the listcruft of 'xxxx people in history' that accumulates is unbelievable and often unsourced. Redirect all to the main MBTI page. Wikipedia is not psychological counselling, nor is it a place for pseudoscience. Polmorry ( talk) 14:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC) reply
206.248.128.5 ( talk) 04:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC) reply