- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- IKeybox ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is about a non-notable password management service and app. Technically not eligible for A7 as it falls under software. There is no credible claim of significance. Neither is there any evidence of notability; fails WP:GNG as no reviews in reliable secondary sources. If we examine the popularity, the Facebook page shows 16 likes while the App Store entry for this shows a mere 17 ratings for all versions. This is a very low level of popularity; I see no reason why a non-notable, non-popular software article should be kept. Additionally, the article creator seems to have a COI here. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 23:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 23:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 23:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 23:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC).
- Delete - Can't find a single reliable secondary source so fails to meet our notability guidelines. DeVerm ( talk) 21:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 04:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No proof of notability. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 01:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- IKeybox ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is about a non-notable password management service and app. Technically not eligible for A7 as it falls under software. There is no credible claim of significance. Neither is there any evidence of notability; fails WP:GNG as no reviews in reliable secondary sources. If we examine the popularity, the Facebook page shows 16 likes while the App Store entry for this shows a mere 17 ratings for all versions. This is a very low level of popularity; I see no reason why a non-notable, non-popular software article should be kept. Additionally, the article creator seems to have a COI here. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 23:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 23:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 23:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 23:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC).
- Delete - Can't find a single reliable secondary source so fails to meet our notability guidelines. DeVerm ( talk) 21:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 04:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No proof of notability. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 01:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.