- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Improve away please! SarahStierch ( talk) 00:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
I, Pet Goat II
- I, Pet Goat II ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM notability. - Mr X 02:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 04:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 04:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- The film's awards need citation and articles at Cartoon Brew, R.A.W.W. Scoop, Short of the Week, Motionographer, Media Roots, Sabotage Times and others are nice, but short films always have a larger hurdle to meet when competing for notability against the big budget, studio blockbusters. Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Strong Keep: The sources linked to by Gene93k clearly display sufficient notability for this bizarre short film. Someone should eventually work them into the article as references, but I'll add them as external links for now, so that they are more visible for future editors. -- Jpcase ( talk) 01:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Improve away please! SarahStierch ( talk) 00:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
I, Pet Goat II
- I, Pet Goat II ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM notability. - Mr X 02:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 04:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 04:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- The film's awards need citation and articles at Cartoon Brew, R.A.W.W. Scoop, Short of the Week, Motionographer, Media Roots, Sabotage Times and others are nice, but short films always have a larger hurdle to meet when competing for notability against the big budget, studio blockbusters. Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Strong Keep: The sources linked to by Gene93k clearly display sufficient notability for this bizarre short film. Someone should eventually work them into the article as references, but I'll add them as external links for now, so that they are more visible for future editors. -- Jpcase ( talk) 01:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.