- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:37, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hypebeast
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hypebeast ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's not clear whether this article is about a dictionary term, an individual businessperson/blogger, or about a Hong Kong company or a New York event. But none of the above appear to be notable using the practice at WP:ORGCRIT or other applicable. It's the same situation as with the first AfD, in which the first commenter stated it fails in "qualifying to the minimum of what a Wikipedia article should be written like. Not to mention that the article is written like an absolute advertisement". ☆ Bri ( talk) 14:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - This would be about a company that runs a blog. My experience with company pages here tells me the rest is just an attempt at inherent notability (such as coining the term at dictionary.com, running a festival, etc.). Judging this based on WP:ORGCRIT, it falls well short of what would be considered notable for Wikipedia. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 22:14, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:37, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hypebeast
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hypebeast ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's not clear whether this article is about a dictionary term, an individual businessperson/blogger, or about a Hong Kong company or a New York event. But none of the above appear to be notable using the practice at WP:ORGCRIT or other applicable. It's the same situation as with the first AfD, in which the first commenter stated it fails in "qualifying to the minimum of what a Wikipedia article should be written like. Not to mention that the article is written like an absolute advertisement". ☆ Bri ( talk) 14:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - This would be about a company that runs a blog. My experience with company pages here tells me the rest is just an attempt at inherent notability (such as coining the term at dictionary.com, running a festival, etc.). Judging this based on WP:ORGCRIT, it falls well short of what would be considered notable for Wikipedia. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 22:14, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.