- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hudson Manilla ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Questionably notable as my searches found nothing better than this and this hasn't changed much since starting in October 2011. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, what the nomination says. Delete. -- Hoary ( talk) 13:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Pinging Bearcat who may be interested to comment. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not at all sure what I have to offer here. Were he Canadian, I could fire up my ProQuest account to see if more newspaper coverage was available than what shows up in a Google News search — but for a British topic, I'm in the same Google boat as everybody else and have no special secret power to find any more sources than anybody else does. Bearcat ( talk) 21:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. no evidence of work in major collections, and the book, presumably of his photographs, One , is not even in WorldCat. DGG ( talk ) 01:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nom and above editors. Nothing in searches to show they meet notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 17:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hudson Manilla ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Questionably notable as my searches found nothing better than this and this hasn't changed much since starting in October 2011. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, what the nomination says. Delete. -- Hoary ( talk) 13:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Pinging Bearcat who may be interested to comment. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not at all sure what I have to offer here. Were he Canadian, I could fire up my ProQuest account to see if more newspaper coverage was available than what shows up in a Google News search — but for a British topic, I'm in the same Google boat as everybody else and have no special secret power to find any more sources than anybody else does. Bearcat ( talk) 21:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. no evidence of work in major collections, and the book, presumably of his photographs, One , is not even in WorldCat. DGG ( talk ) 01:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nom and above editors. Nothing in searches to show they meet notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 17:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.