- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America 1000 17:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Howler (magazine)
- Howler (magazine) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. I also found http://www.printmag.com/featured/howler-magazine/ and http://www.coolhunting.com/culture/interview-george-quraishi-of-howler-magazine which, along with the TopDrawerSoccer.com reference might push it over the top, but I don't know if that's the case. I would argue that if survives, it would need a rewrite. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 23. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 11:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, may be notable someday, but not at this time. Kierzek ( talk) 13:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails GNG no indication of any third party coverage of the magazine. Fenix down ( talk) 18:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as simply nothing else for the applicable notability and it's only newly started so it's not like there's going to be years and years of the needed coverage too. Nothing at all convincing. SwisterTwister talk 08:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America 1000 17:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Howler (magazine)
- Howler (magazine) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. I also found http://www.printmag.com/featured/howler-magazine/ and http://www.coolhunting.com/culture/interview-george-quraishi-of-howler-magazine which, along with the TopDrawerSoccer.com reference might push it over the top, but I don't know if that's the case. I would argue that if survives, it would need a rewrite. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 23. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 11:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, may be notable someday, but not at this time. Kierzek ( talk) 13:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails GNG no indication of any third party coverage of the magazine. Fenix down ( talk) 18:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as simply nothing else for the applicable notability and it's only newly started so it's not like there's going to be years and years of the needed coverage too. Nothing at all convincing. SwisterTwister talk 08:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.