The result was delete. The "keep" opinion(s) is/are unconvincing and does/do not address the problems identified in the nomination. Sandstein 09:11, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:NORG WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Of the 31 sources that were accesible. Passing mentions or trivial coverage : 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17(dead link), 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 32, 34, 35 Affiliated: 1 No mention of the subject: 11, 22, 31. there is literally no in-depth secondary coverage of the band. Some of their competition wins were because they were the only participants. This is really a WP:ORGVANITY page clearly edited by members of the band with comments such as "Many spectators and experts disagreed completely with the result stating in outrage that "Atticall band should have won" another said " They were the clear winners"." this page fails WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTPROMO. All the passing mentions and trivial WP:REFBOMBING does not hide the fact that this is not notable enough to have a page in WP: Dom from Paris ( talk) 09:49, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. The "keep" opinion(s) is/are unconvincing and does/do not address the problems identified in the nomination. Sandstein 09:11, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:NORG WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Of the 31 sources that were accesible. Passing mentions or trivial coverage : 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17(dead link), 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 32, 34, 35 Affiliated: 1 No mention of the subject: 11, 22, 31. there is literally no in-depth secondary coverage of the band. Some of their competition wins were because they were the only participants. This is really a WP:ORGVANITY page clearly edited by members of the band with comments such as "Many spectators and experts disagreed completely with the result stating in outrage that "Atticall band should have won" another said " They were the clear winners"." this page fails WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTPROMO. All the passing mentions and trivial WP:REFBOMBING does not hide the fact that this is not notable enough to have a page in WP: Dom from Paris ( talk) 09:49, 17 October 2018 (UTC)