The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
:Wow, how rude~
WP:PERSONAL ATTACK right there, haha. I found only 5 sources in the JP article; you mind elaborating how that's not a stub? Also, you might wanna cite some actual guidelines, just saying. ^_^
What I would argue is that the article should be kept, because I think that there is potential for some constructive
translation from the
japanese article. I noticed that
Evan1975 has some japanese proficiency - certainly more than I - maybe they could contribute further with Kaneko's stage career as described there? There is no doubt that both articles could use more sources, but I think thats symptomatic of the language research barrier. Its too easy to just delete an article like this just because of an initial lack of sources - theres some potential here I think.
ƒin (
talk)
23:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The JA article is practically a filmography dump with less than one full paragraph for the biography. What's there to expand? Lack of sources is lack of sources. Do you have any guidelines to cite in your counterargument?
Sk8erPrince (
talk)
00:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)reply
This is a situational source, and can be used to shortcut verify the roles as long as the credit itself has a green check-mark that leads to an on-screen capture of the closing credit that confirms the role. The problem is that I don't see any check marks next to the roles mentioned. I would go through the websites listed on our ORS list to see if you can find anything. Another good place to look is here:
[1]. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
18:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
:Wow, how rude~
WP:PERSONAL ATTACK right there, haha. I found only 5 sources in the JP article; you mind elaborating how that's not a stub? Also, you might wanna cite some actual guidelines, just saying. ^_^
What I would argue is that the article should be kept, because I think that there is potential for some constructive
translation from the
japanese article. I noticed that
Evan1975 has some japanese proficiency - certainly more than I - maybe they could contribute further with Kaneko's stage career as described there? There is no doubt that both articles could use more sources, but I think thats symptomatic of the language research barrier. Its too easy to just delete an article like this just because of an initial lack of sources - theres some potential here I think.
ƒin (
talk)
23:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The JA article is practically a filmography dump with less than one full paragraph for the biography. What's there to expand? Lack of sources is lack of sources. Do you have any guidelines to cite in your counterargument?
Sk8erPrince (
talk)
00:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)reply
This is a situational source, and can be used to shortcut verify the roles as long as the credit itself has a green check-mark that leads to an on-screen capture of the closing credit that confirms the role. The problem is that I don't see any check marks next to the roles mentioned. I would go through the websites listed on our ORS list to see if you can find anything. Another good place to look is here:
[1]. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
18:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.