- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:40, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Hillard Heintze
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hillard Heintze ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Of the fifteen refs cited, 12 are to the organisation’s own website, one is a listing, one is not a ref about the company, and one is to a page updated so it no longer mentions Hillard Heintze. Notability not demonstrated. Mccapra ( talk) 22:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- delete Most references are to the company's website, one is to a list with no significant coverage, and the executive protection article doesn't even mention this company. Non-notable business that also fails the GNG. Sandals1 ( talk) 22:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: An article created by a WP:SPA with poor references (primary sources and passing mention of an individual associated with the firm). I am seeing nothing better than passing mention of reports and acquisitions by this firm, which are enough to verify it as a company going about its business but insufficient for WP:NCORP. AllyD ( talk) 15:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This appears to be a case of WP:REFBOMBing. Fails GNG. Chetsford ( talk) 17:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ansh 666 07:40, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Hillard Heintze
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hillard Heintze ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Of the fifteen refs cited, 12 are to the organisation’s own website, one is a listing, one is not a ref about the company, and one is to a page updated so it no longer mentions Hillard Heintze. Notability not demonstrated. Mccapra ( talk) 22:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- delete Most references are to the company's website, one is to a list with no significant coverage, and the executive protection article doesn't even mention this company. Non-notable business that also fails the GNG. Sandals1 ( talk) 22:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: An article created by a WP:SPA with poor references (primary sources and passing mention of an individual associated with the firm). I am seeing nothing better than passing mention of reports and acquisitions by this firm, which are enough to verify it as a company going about its business but insufficient for WP:NCORP. AllyD ( talk) 15:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This appears to be a case of WP:REFBOMBing. Fails GNG. Chetsford ( talk) 17:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.