The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 09:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Could find some coverage and there will be more in the Indian reginal language media.
Pharaoh of the Wizards (
talk) 12:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep - per above for GNG, just enough out there - esp.
[1],
[2]. I'll add
[3] too. The hosting of the
2017 FIFA U-17 World Cup was a rather big event in Indian football, so any coverage from that isn't routine or anything of the sort in my opinion. Pinging
Pharaoh of the Wizards, who I'm assuming forgot to leave an actual 'vote'.
R96Skinner (
talk) 01:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)reply
I'm happy to withdraw based on GNG pass thanks to sources now located if @
BlameRuiner: wants to amend their vote?
GiantSnowman 12:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
No I'll stay by my vote as I still don't a significant coverage. Although it's clear that there's no consensus to delete anyway. --
BlameRuiner (
talk) 12:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep overwhelming evidence of GNG significant coverage in various sources posted above. I'm perplexed on today's claims that there's no significant coverage, with no explanation on how in-depth articles don't count.
Nfitz (
talk) 17:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Nothing to be perplexed about. The sources were only located after the AFD was started.
GiantSnowman 18:08, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
It was the today's claim by
User:BlameRuiner that perplexed me, rather than the original and earlier comments. I clarified my post above.
Nfitz (
talk) 19:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Almost all sources just repeat the same information about two local boys that got selected for U17 NT and everyone happy for them (and our boy Hendry didn't even play a single minute). I didn't see any in-depth coverage that justifies GNG. --
BlameRuiner (
talk) 19:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
I'd hardly call
The Times of India 'local'. It's the biggest English newspaper on the planet, and certainly not local. Or
The Hindu which must be close to be number 2 in the world - though I suppose it could be described as local ... but it's hardly a local story. Is
The Sporting News also local -
Sporting News is based in North Carolina.
Nfitz (
talk) 20:20, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 09:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Could find some coverage and there will be more in the Indian reginal language media.
Pharaoh of the Wizards (
talk) 12:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep - per above for GNG, just enough out there - esp.
[1],
[2]. I'll add
[3] too. The hosting of the
2017 FIFA U-17 World Cup was a rather big event in Indian football, so any coverage from that isn't routine or anything of the sort in my opinion. Pinging
Pharaoh of the Wizards, who I'm assuming forgot to leave an actual 'vote'.
R96Skinner (
talk) 01:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)reply
I'm happy to withdraw based on GNG pass thanks to sources now located if @
BlameRuiner: wants to amend their vote?
GiantSnowman 12:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
No I'll stay by my vote as I still don't a significant coverage. Although it's clear that there's no consensus to delete anyway. --
BlameRuiner (
talk) 12:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep overwhelming evidence of GNG significant coverage in various sources posted above. I'm perplexed on today's claims that there's no significant coverage, with no explanation on how in-depth articles don't count.
Nfitz (
talk) 17:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Nothing to be perplexed about. The sources were only located after the AFD was started.
GiantSnowman 18:08, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
It was the today's claim by
User:BlameRuiner that perplexed me, rather than the original and earlier comments. I clarified my post above.
Nfitz (
talk) 19:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Almost all sources just repeat the same information about two local boys that got selected for U17 NT and everyone happy for them (and our boy Hendry didn't even play a single minute). I didn't see any in-depth coverage that justifies GNG. --
BlameRuiner (
talk) 19:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
I'd hardly call
The Times of India 'local'. It's the biggest English newspaper on the planet, and certainly not local. Or
The Hindu which must be close to be number 2 in the world - though I suppose it could be described as local ... but it's hardly a local story. Is
The Sporting News also local -
Sporting News is based in North Carolina.
Nfitz (
talk) 20:20, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.