From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down ( talk) 09:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Hendry Antonay

Hendry Antonay (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by article creator. Player is yet to play in a fully-professional league) (confirmed by this, so fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also no significant coverage, so fails WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 09:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Delete as per nom. Hughesdarren ( talk) 09:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Could find some coverage and there will be more in the Indian reginal language media. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 12:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Levivich: What happened again? Giant Snowman 08:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC) reply
GiantSnowman, R96 and I agreed on an AfD. Leviv ich 16:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Frightening! :D R96Skinner ( talk) 16:29, 21 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Very scary!
  • I'm happy to withdraw based on GNG pass thanks to sources now located if @ BlameRuiner: wants to amend their vote? Giant Snowman 12:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
No I'll stay by my vote as I still don't a significant coverage. Although it's clear that there's no consensus to delete anyway. -- BlameRuiner ( talk) 12:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep overwhelming evidence of GNG significant coverage in various sources posted above. I'm perplexed on today's claims that there's no significant coverage, with no explanation on how in-depth articles don't count. Nfitz ( talk) 17:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Nothing to be perplexed about. The sources were only located after the AFD was started. Giant Snowman 18:08, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
It was the today's claim by User:BlameRuiner that perplexed me, rather than the original and earlier comments. I clarified my post above. Nfitz ( talk) 19:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Almost all sources just repeat the same information about two local boys that got selected for U17 NT and everyone happy for them (and our boy Hendry didn't even play a single minute). I didn't see any in-depth coverage that justifies GNG. -- BlameRuiner ( talk) 19:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
I'd hardly call The Times of India 'local'. It's the biggest English newspaper on the planet, and certainly not local. Or The Hindu which must be close to be number 2 in the world - though I suppose it could be described as local ... but it's hardly a local story. Is The Sporting News also local - Sporting News is based in North Carolina. Nfitz ( talk) 20:20, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down ( talk) 09:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Hendry Antonay

Hendry Antonay (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by article creator. Player is yet to play in a fully-professional league) (confirmed by this, so fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also no significant coverage, so fails WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 09:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Delete as per nom. Hughesdarren ( talk) 09:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Could find some coverage and there will be more in the Indian reginal language media. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 12:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Levivich: What happened again? Giant Snowman 08:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC) reply
GiantSnowman, R96 and I agreed on an AfD. Leviv ich 16:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Frightening! :D R96Skinner ( talk) 16:29, 21 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Very scary!
  • I'm happy to withdraw based on GNG pass thanks to sources now located if @ BlameRuiner: wants to amend their vote? Giant Snowman 12:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
No I'll stay by my vote as I still don't a significant coverage. Although it's clear that there's no consensus to delete anyway. -- BlameRuiner ( talk) 12:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep overwhelming evidence of GNG significant coverage in various sources posted above. I'm perplexed on today's claims that there's no significant coverage, with no explanation on how in-depth articles don't count. Nfitz ( talk) 17:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Nothing to be perplexed about. The sources were only located after the AFD was started. Giant Snowman 18:08, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
It was the today's claim by User:BlameRuiner that perplexed me, rather than the original and earlier comments. I clarified my post above. Nfitz ( talk) 19:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Almost all sources just repeat the same information about two local boys that got selected for U17 NT and everyone happy for them (and our boy Hendry didn't even play a single minute). I didn't see any in-depth coverage that justifies GNG. -- BlameRuiner ( talk) 19:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
I'd hardly call The Times of India 'local'. It's the biggest English newspaper on the planet, and certainly not local. Or The Hindu which must be close to be number 2 in the world - though I suppose it could be described as local ... but it's hardly a local story. Is The Sporting News also local - Sporting News is based in North Carolina. Nfitz ( talk) 20:20, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook