The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Questionable claims as sources appear to be from a single source (i.e press releases). For example, IB Times and The Statesman do not have bylines, which suggest the articles are from press releases and not vetted or Editorial dept by the publications.
Infogapp1 (
talk)
22:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)reply
delete This is all PR trash. As a note anything in the "inspiration-hub" of Statesmen ought not be considered reliable, it's submitted PR trash.
Praxidicae (
talk)
22:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete highly promotional editor, always introducing bias and puffery content with no regard of copyright. Secondly, the subject's media coverage is nothing but a COVID19-conversation which has provided an opportunity for many non notable subjects to become partially notable. Keeping this situation in mind, any topic (including companies, organizations, corporations, people, and businesses) be not considered as notable that popped up in media during COVID19 pandemic. They fall under
WP:SINGLEEVENT and
WP:INVALIDBIO criteria. Regards
TheBirdsShedTears (
talk)
17:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Questionable claims as sources appear to be from a single source (i.e press releases). For example, IB Times and The Statesman do not have bylines, which suggest the articles are from press releases and not vetted or Editorial dept by the publications.
Infogapp1 (
talk)
22:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)reply
delete This is all PR trash. As a note anything in the "inspiration-hub" of Statesmen ought not be considered reliable, it's submitted PR trash.
Praxidicae (
talk)
22:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete highly promotional editor, always introducing bias and puffery content with no regard of copyright. Secondly, the subject's media coverage is nothing but a COVID19-conversation which has provided an opportunity for many non notable subjects to become partially notable. Keeping this situation in mind, any topic (including companies, organizations, corporations, people, and businesses) be not considered as notable that popped up in media during COVID19 pandemic. They fall under
WP:SINGLEEVENT and
WP:INVALIDBIO criteria. Regards
TheBirdsShedTears (
talk)
17:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.