The result was merge to American Idiot. Firsfron of Ronchester 13:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. PROD rationale was " Non-notable film: According to the article, screened only once, for ~500 people and 'It has been reported that the movie would be released on DVD but as of 2011, no news has been announced if this is, in fact, true.' Only source is a Green Day fan site." Reason given for removal was "Page should remain up because it was a featured film that was shown in a theater. Its not like it was a private film shown to 3 people in a basement. It was a feature film shown in a theater and it still might make it to DVD." The length of the film and how many people saw it makes little difference: As usual, the threshold for inclusion (per policy) is not merely that something exists, but that it has received coverage in reliable third-party sources. The likelihood of a film that was only screened once for 500 fans receiving significant coverage from multiple third-party sources is slim to nil. Whether it "still might make it to DVD" is completely irrelevant: If/when it does, maybe then it'll receive the secondary source coverage necessary to justify an encyclopedia article about it. Our notability thresholds are based on the existence of source coverage, not whether such coverage may exist at some undetermined point in the future. IllaZilla ( talk) 13:21, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to American Idiot. Firsfron of Ronchester 13:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. PROD rationale was " Non-notable film: According to the article, screened only once, for ~500 people and 'It has been reported that the movie would be released on DVD but as of 2011, no news has been announced if this is, in fact, true.' Only source is a Green Day fan site." Reason given for removal was "Page should remain up because it was a featured film that was shown in a theater. Its not like it was a private film shown to 3 people in a basement. It was a feature film shown in a theater and it still might make it to DVD." The length of the film and how many people saw it makes little difference: As usual, the threshold for inclusion (per policy) is not merely that something exists, but that it has received coverage in reliable third-party sources. The likelihood of a film that was only screened once for 500 fans receiving significant coverage from multiple third-party sources is slim to nil. Whether it "still might make it to DVD" is completely irrelevant: If/when it does, maybe then it'll receive the secondary source coverage necessary to justify an encyclopedia article about it. Our notability thresholds are based on the existence of source coverage, not whether such coverage may exist at some undetermined point in the future. IllaZilla ( talk) 13:21, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply