The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not sure if those are enough to merit a 'keep' vote, but this is clearly not a slam dunk for deletion. My search was brief, and results of a more comprehensive search may prove more effective.
Cbl62 (
talk)
21:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: I took a look at those sources, and did a check myself, but while they all mention a rivalry none of them actually cover it in depth as a topic. I'm leaning towards delete here, but will hold off on a !vote in case other sources can be found.
Let'srun (
talk)
14:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm on the fence but leaning keep. To my surprise,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Canyon Rivalry closed as "Keep" a couple days ago (I had voted "delete") with far less of a claim to be a notable rivalry. In this case, we have a legit and historic rivalry between programs with real connectons (both academically rigorous Quaker colleges located about 10 miles apart in the Philadelphia suburbs). The search for coverage is inhibited a bit given that the two colleges stopped playing each other in football 50 years ago -- well before the era of mass media and the internet. We should factor that into our evaluation of what constitutes SIGCOV.
Cbl62 (
talk)
21:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Lean keep. Although most of the coverage is short, there is a lot of it suggesting this was a notable rivalry. In addition to the coverage found by Cbl:
1941 Haverford News ("...heated rivalry...third-oldest intercollegiate rivalry in the United States...")
2021 This Is Lower Merion ("The Fords went out in style, topping Swarthmore 22-21 in the final game of a storied rivalry, one that dated back to 1879.")
1919 New York Times ("SWARTHMORE WINS EASILY.; Swamps Old Rivals from Haverford")
Coverage in Swarthmore College: An Informal History.
1916 New York Times ("HAVERFORD IS VICTORIOUS.; Conquers Its Ancient Rival")
1914 Evening Public Ledger ("Haverford-Swarthmore Football History Notable") – probably the best one – gives good-sized account of the series history.
Weak Delete Keep: While there have been multiple sources presented, I'm just not seeing any in-depth sources discussing this game series as a rivalry. The sources offered in this AfD do mention a rivalry, but none of them have the
WP:SIGCOV needed to meet the
WP:GNG. We should be viewing this based on the existence of sources, not the presumption that they may exist, as well. Willing to change my vote if better sources are found, so please ping me if so. Changing vote per source found below.
Let'srun (
talk)
22:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not sure if those are enough to merit a 'keep' vote, but this is clearly not a slam dunk for deletion. My search was brief, and results of a more comprehensive search may prove more effective.
Cbl62 (
talk)
21:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: I took a look at those sources, and did a check myself, but while they all mention a rivalry none of them actually cover it in depth as a topic. I'm leaning towards delete here, but will hold off on a !vote in case other sources can be found.
Let'srun (
talk)
14:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm on the fence but leaning keep. To my surprise,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Canyon Rivalry closed as "Keep" a couple days ago (I had voted "delete") with far less of a claim to be a notable rivalry. In this case, we have a legit and historic rivalry between programs with real connectons (both academically rigorous Quaker colleges located about 10 miles apart in the Philadelphia suburbs). The search for coverage is inhibited a bit given that the two colleges stopped playing each other in football 50 years ago -- well before the era of mass media and the internet. We should factor that into our evaluation of what constitutes SIGCOV.
Cbl62 (
talk)
21:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Lean keep. Although most of the coverage is short, there is a lot of it suggesting this was a notable rivalry. In addition to the coverage found by Cbl:
1941 Haverford News ("...heated rivalry...third-oldest intercollegiate rivalry in the United States...")
2021 This Is Lower Merion ("The Fords went out in style, topping Swarthmore 22-21 in the final game of a storied rivalry, one that dated back to 1879.")
1919 New York Times ("SWARTHMORE WINS EASILY.; Swamps Old Rivals from Haverford")
Coverage in Swarthmore College: An Informal History.
1916 New York Times ("HAVERFORD IS VICTORIOUS.; Conquers Its Ancient Rival")
1914 Evening Public Ledger ("Haverford-Swarthmore Football History Notable") – probably the best one – gives good-sized account of the series history.
Weak Delete Keep: While there have been multiple sources presented, I'm just not seeing any in-depth sources discussing this game series as a rivalry. The sources offered in this AfD do mention a rivalry, but none of them have the
WP:SIGCOV needed to meet the
WP:GNG. We should be viewing this based on the existence of sources, not the presumption that they may exist, as well. Willing to change my vote if better sources are found, so please ping me if so. Changing vote per source found below.
Let'srun (
talk)
22:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.