The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
None of this establishes actual independent notability and substance since it's simply a business listing as the sole sources are their own business listings, nothing better was found My hat's unsurprising for such a trivial company. Our policies are clear about company advertising and this one is no different.
SwisterTwistertalk 16:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: The history of this article shows a couple of points when
WP:PROD was discussed, initially rejected because of the firm's stock market listing. The sources remained insufficient for
WP:CORPDEPTH though, and my searches have been finding mere routine announcements. But most significantly, there was an April 2016 announcement that
Annaly Capital Management, Inc were acquiring
Hatteras Financial Corp (
[1] – via
HighBeam(subscription required) ). This is presumably why previous primary references are now dead links. A redirect is possible, but I am not seeing
evidence that this firm met the notability criteria.
AllyD (
talk) 21:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Surprisingly fails GNG and
WP:CORPDEPTH which is unusual given it has (had) a NYSE listing.
-- HighKing++ 17:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
None of this establishes actual independent notability and substance since it's simply a business listing as the sole sources are their own business listings, nothing better was found My hat's unsurprising for such a trivial company. Our policies are clear about company advertising and this one is no different.
SwisterTwistertalk 16:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete: The history of this article shows a couple of points when
WP:PROD was discussed, initially rejected because of the firm's stock market listing. The sources remained insufficient for
WP:CORPDEPTH though, and my searches have been finding mere routine announcements. But most significantly, there was an April 2016 announcement that
Annaly Capital Management, Inc were acquiring
Hatteras Financial Corp (
[1] – via
HighBeam(subscription required) ). This is presumably why previous primary references are now dead links. A redirect is possible, but I am not seeing
evidence that this firm met the notability criteria.
AllyD (
talk) 21:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Surprisingly fails GNG and
WP:CORPDEPTH which is unusual given it has (had) a NYSE listing.
-- HighKing++ 17:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.