From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 01:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hashneen Chauhan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress, no major parts. Coverage is typical celebrity fluff or cast lists. Oaktree b ( talk) 20:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Speedy Delete Clearly not notable enough to be on the mainspace. A prime example of self-published promotional sources was added to the article. Reference bombings to cite a one line was quite hillarious. Khorang 05:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 01:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hashneen Chauhan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress, no major parts. Coverage is typical celebrity fluff or cast lists. Oaktree b ( talk) 20:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Speedy Delete Clearly not notable enough to be on the mainspace. A prime example of self-published promotional sources was added to the article. Reference bombings to cite a one line was quite hillarious. Khorang 05:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook