The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Biblioworm 16:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)reply
This businessman fails
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO. He seems to have been an executive in a lot of redlinked or unlinked companies. Not seeing anything but PR releases about him.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 06:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as you won't believe this
Clarityfiend but I was sweeping the random pages tonight and happened to slate this for deletion later.
As for the article, I'm simply not seeing any better improvement. Pinging the only still active past user
Skyerise.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, agree with reasons for deletion. Does not appear to rise to the level of general notability.
Skyerise (
talk) 19:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Biblioworm 16:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)reply
This businessman fails
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO. He seems to have been an executive in a lot of redlinked or unlinked companies. Not seeing anything but PR releases about him.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 06:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as you won't believe this
Clarityfiend but I was sweeping the random pages tonight and happened to slate this for deletion later.
As for the article, I'm simply not seeing any better improvement. Pinging the only still active past user
Skyerise.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, agree with reasons for deletion. Does not appear to rise to the level of general notability.
Skyerise (
talk) 19:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.