The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep.
Emoji is not a reasonable merge target, as this is primarily a written mark. It is mentioned
here. Closer would be
fleuron (typography) but I suspect a Japanese speaker will be able to find enough sources for an article on this topic to stand on its own. --
Sammy1339 (
talk)
03:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge to
O mark or transwiki to
Wiktionary only if sources can be found to eliminate the possibility of original research: this topic would be better covered in another article or a dictionary because there isn't much to cover about the topic (see
WP:NOPAGE § 3); this is pretty much original research in its current state. If someone can find sources describing the character and its use in praise, then cover it, but else, delete or redirect. Esquivaliencet03:57, 12 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Transwiki or delete: I could not find much discussion on the specific character. As-is, the page cannot stand on Wikipedia. No objection to keeping it if significant good sources talking about the character that aren't just dictionary definitions are found.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions)
09:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep.
Emoji is not a reasonable merge target, as this is primarily a written mark. It is mentioned
here. Closer would be
fleuron (typography) but I suspect a Japanese speaker will be able to find enough sources for an article on this topic to stand on its own. --
Sammy1339 (
talk)
03:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge to
O mark or transwiki to
Wiktionary only if sources can be found to eliminate the possibility of original research: this topic would be better covered in another article or a dictionary because there isn't much to cover about the topic (see
WP:NOPAGE § 3); this is pretty much original research in its current state. If someone can find sources describing the character and its use in praise, then cover it, but else, delete or redirect. Esquivaliencet03:57, 12 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Transwiki or delete: I could not find much discussion on the specific character. As-is, the page cannot stand on Wikipedia. No objection to keeping it if significant good sources talking about the character that aren't just dictionary definitions are found.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions)
09:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.