The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
Randykitty (
talk) 17:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, and per Omnipaedista. No real evidence of meeting Wikipedia notability criteria, and the material on the 'theory' is almost devoid of intelligible content.
AndyTheGrump (
talk) 02:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Lacks the independent coverage required by GNG.
131.118.229.17 (
talk) 01:30, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
Randykitty (
talk) 17:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, and per Omnipaedista. No real evidence of meeting Wikipedia notability criteria, and the material on the 'theory' is almost devoid of intelligible content.
AndyTheGrump (
talk) 02:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Lacks the independent coverage required by GNG.
131.118.229.17 (
talk) 01:30, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.