The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No evidence of any notability. IMDB refs don't contribute to notability and the rest all appear to be either one ref repeated used or derived from a press release. Draft:Habiba Sinare has been rejected as unsuitable for Wikipedia and this looks like an attempt to circumvent the Draft review process. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 16:42, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No evidence of any notability. IMDB refs don't contribute to notability and the rest all appear to be either one ref repeated used or derived from a press release. Draft:Habiba Sinare has been rejected as unsuitable for Wikipedia and this looks like an attempt to circumvent the Draft review process. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 16:42, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)