The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌀 Locomotive207- talk 🌀 00:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This was prodded, redirected, restored immediately after, and put through two more AfDs after that, all within a few weeks in May 2009. That was well before people took a good look at GNIS's reliability issues, but at any rate the notion that GNIS constituted official recognition was always inconsistent with the authority GNIS actually claimed (which was over names, not place classification). In the end this is well-documented to be just another of the many subdivisions entered willy-nilly, and the coverage cited in the article is routine stuff. This shouldn't have been created, it shouldn't have been redirected, it shouldn't have been recreated, and it should never have been kept when considered for deletion twelve years ago. Mangoe ( talk) 18:24, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌀 Locomotive207- talk 🌀 00:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This was prodded, redirected, restored immediately after, and put through two more AfDs after that, all within a few weeks in May 2009. That was well before people took a good look at GNIS's reliability issues, but at any rate the notion that GNIS constituted official recognition was always inconsistent with the authority GNIS actually claimed (which was over names, not place classification). In the end this is well-documented to be just another of the many subdivisions entered willy-nilly, and the coverage cited in the article is routine stuff. This shouldn't have been created, it shouldn't have been redirected, it shouldn't have been recreated, and it should never have been kept when considered for deletion twelve years ago. Mangoe ( talk) 18:24, 18 September 2021 (UTC)