- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Greg Hoy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and notability criteria for musicians and ensembles. He is only mentioned in one of the references provided in the article. Searches turn up a few concert announcements and a single short article by a staff writer in the Pittsburgh City paper (Anonymous. "Hoy." Pittsburgh City Paper. 2003. HighBeam Research. (March 16, 2018). link. There is certainly nothing to support all of the claims made in the article which, created as the first edit of a SPA, looks suspiciously like UPE. Jbh Talk 20:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 20:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete would have been stopped at AfC when WP:ACTRIAL was running. Legacypac ( talk) 21:07, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- creator has commentsd at Talk:Greg_Hoy Legacypac ( talk) 22:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete not notable, as far as I can see. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 02:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. His songs on youtube seem to have double digit views, his tech work doesn't look notable either. He's quite chatty on the websites but the refs don't mean anything without a claim to notability. Szzuk ( talk) 19:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Greg Hoy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and notability criteria for musicians and ensembles. He is only mentioned in one of the references provided in the article. Searches turn up a few concert announcements and a single short article by a staff writer in the Pittsburgh City paper (Anonymous. "Hoy." Pittsburgh City Paper. 2003. HighBeam Research. (March 16, 2018). link. There is certainly nothing to support all of the claims made in the article which, created as the first edit of a SPA, looks suspiciously like UPE. Jbh Talk 20:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 20:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete would have been stopped at AfC when WP:ACTRIAL was running. Legacypac ( talk) 21:07, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- creator has commentsd at Talk:Greg_Hoy Legacypac ( talk) 22:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete not notable, as far as I can see. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 02:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. His songs on youtube seem to have double digit views, his tech work doesn't look notable either. He's quite chatty on the websites but the refs don't mean anything without a claim to notability. Szzuk ( talk) 19:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.