The result was no consensus. This discussion did not attract a lot of attention, and I feel that most of the arguments were fairly weak. Therefore, I don't think that it would be disruptive to renominate the article. However, since the two keep voters seemed amenable to a merger, I believe that would be a better immediate way forward. Mark Arsten ( talk) 07:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable bus line in Cleveland. No evidence of notability at all. GrapedApe ( talk) 02:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Unscintillating ( talk) 03:04, 5 August 2012 (UTC) replyThe result was speedy close. The article merger process for duplicate articles does not involve either AFD or the administrator deletion tool in any way or at any stage. Neither does turning an article into a redirect (or vice versa). This is a mis-use of AFD for something that ordinary editors can enact and discuss on talk pages without any need for administrator involvement or tools. AFD has quite enough traffic as it is, without wasting participant time and effort on things that don't even need a deletion tool at all and that editors can do for themselves. Also note that notability is not addressed solely with deletion nominations, and there are plenty of venues (such as appropriate WikiProjects) for seeking third opinions on disputed mergers without abusing AFD for that purpose. Uncle G ( talk) 13:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This discussion did not attract a lot of attention, and I feel that most of the arguments were fairly weak. Therefore, I don't think that it would be disruptive to renominate the article. However, since the two keep voters seemed amenable to a merger, I believe that would be a better immediate way forward. Mark Arsten ( talk) 07:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable bus line in Cleveland. No evidence of notability at all. GrapedApe ( talk) 02:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Unscintillating ( talk) 03:04, 5 August 2012 (UTC) replyThe result was speedy close. The article merger process for duplicate articles does not involve either AFD or the administrator deletion tool in any way or at any stage. Neither does turning an article into a redirect (or vice versa). This is a mis-use of AFD for something that ordinary editors can enact and discuss on talk pages without any need for administrator involvement or tools. AFD has quite enough traffic as it is, without wasting participant time and effort on things that don't even need a deletion tool at all and that editors can do for themselves. Also note that notability is not addressed solely with deletion nominations, and there are plenty of venues (such as appropriate WikiProjects) for seeking third opinions on disputed mergers without abusing AFD for that purpose. Uncle G ( talk) 13:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)