The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - I guess the alumni are too busy to write something about their alma mater. If we delete this, somebody will think of writing a decent article.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
21:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Sorry, I was responding to the comment by the nominator. The "reasons" for deletion are obvious, material copied from the institute's web sites and literature, by editors that appear to be employees of the institute. I changed the above vote to a comment.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
17:47, 1 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - The subject is notable, and a new editor has gotten involved recently, after the nomination for deletion, and is making improvements.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
17:48, 1 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - I have started making changes and improvements to the article - right from rewriting the content to credible referencing (news articles etc.) I will continue doing so and request the deletion request to be taken back.
Sushree27 (
talk)
07:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - I guess the alumni are too busy to write something about their alma mater. If we delete this, somebody will think of writing a decent article.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
21:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Sorry, I was responding to the comment by the nominator. The "reasons" for deletion are obvious, material copied from the institute's web sites and literature, by editors that appear to be employees of the institute. I changed the above vote to a comment.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
17:47, 1 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - The subject is notable, and a new editor has gotten involved recently, after the nomination for deletion, and is making improvements.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
17:48, 1 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - I have started making changes and improvements to the article - right from rewriting the content to credible referencing (news articles etc.) I will continue doing so and request the deletion request to be taken back.
Sushree27 (
talk)
07:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.