The result was keep. SNOW DGG ( talk ) 05:23, 7 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Delete, as speculation and WP:Crystal. Sources don't deal with the company merely the possibility of an announcement that could be to the moon and maybe not Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 00:37, 4 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Maybe since it so cut and dry you can explain where I'm wrong. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 01:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC) reply
"In 1962, Charles van Doren, who was later a senior editor at Britannica, said, "The ideal encyclopedia should be radical. It should stop being safe." But if you know the history of Britannica since 1962, it has been anything but radical. It's still very, very safe.
Wikipedia, on the other hand, comes from a very radical idea, and that radical idea is for us to all imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That is what we are doing at Wikipedia.— Jimmy Wales, ... on the birth of Wikipedia, TED Talks
The result was keep. SNOW DGG ( talk ) 05:23, 7 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Delete, as speculation and WP:Crystal. Sources don't deal with the company merely the possibility of an announcement that could be to the moon and maybe not Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 00:37, 4 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Maybe since it so cut and dry you can explain where I'm wrong. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 01:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC) reply
"In 1962, Charles van Doren, who was later a senior editor at Britannica, said, "The ideal encyclopedia should be radical. It should stop being safe." But if you know the history of Britannica since 1962, it has been anything but radical. It's still very, very safe.
Wikipedia, on the other hand, comes from a very radical idea, and that radical idea is for us to all imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That is what we are doing at Wikipedia.— Jimmy Wales, ... on the birth of Wikipedia, TED Talks