- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 20:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Glen Meadows
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Glen Meadows ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sourced to online directories and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:NACTOR / WP:PORNBIO. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:00, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of any notability, Hasn't won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 19:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia's most over inflated categories are those for pornographic performers, although I would put the sports categories as a close second. This individual clearly does not merit an article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 22:42, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 20:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Glen Meadows
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Glen Meadows ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sourced to online directories and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:NACTOR / WP:PORNBIO. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:00, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of any notability, Hasn't won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 19:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia's most over inflated categories are those for pornographic performers, although I would put the sports categories as a close second. This individual clearly does not merit an article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 22:42, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.