The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:14, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
*Delete No indication of being notable. No coverage and no suitable redirect target. Fails
WP:SIGCOV.
scope_creep
Talk 15:39, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
*Redirect to
Neustift am Walde, which (now) includes a section on Glanzing -
WP:ATD. A thorough search shows that there are sources for the church not yet in the article - for example, the
Historisches Lexikon Wien and Bandion's Steinerne Zeugen des Glaubens. Die Heiligen Stätten der Stadt Wien (1989), pp. 399 f. - which probably would amount to SIGCOV. However,the history of the church makes better sense in the context of the history of the settlement, so for that reason I favour the redirect.
Ingratis (
talk) 23:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:14, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
*Delete No indication of being notable. No coverage and no suitable redirect target. Fails
WP:SIGCOV.
scope_creep
Talk 15:39, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
*Redirect to
Neustift am Walde, which (now) includes a section on Glanzing -
WP:ATD. A thorough search shows that there are sources for the church not yet in the article - for example, the
Historisches Lexikon Wien and Bandion's Steinerne Zeugen des Glaubens. Die Heiligen Stätten der Stadt Wien (1989), pp. 399 f. - which probably would amount to SIGCOV. However,the history of the church makes better sense in the context of the history of the settlement, so for that reason I favour the redirect.
Ingratis (
talk) 23:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)