From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 18:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Gladiators of Rome (2012 film) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion as a page created by User:Mr. Lama, a confirmed sockpuppet of User:Giovannigiulio. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 00:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep and warn the nominator as they are mass-nominating/prodding all the articles of Mr. Lama, regardless of when they were created, regardless of who else edited them, regardless of their notability and even regardless of their actual sourcing. If Mr. Lama/Giovannigiulio was ever disruptive, nomitator is being disruptive as well, possibly more. In a case like this, G5 is clearly not eligible, notability is obvious, there is no improvement for the encyclopedia from the deletion of the article, and AfD like these are just a big waste of time for the community, who has better things to do. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
information Administrator note I think we're going to have to do a history merge with Not Born to Be Gladiators. An IP appears to have performed a cut and paste move in July. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
History merge has been carried out. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 18:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Gladiators of Rome (2012 film) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion as a page created by User:Mr. Lama, a confirmed sockpuppet of User:Giovannigiulio. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 00:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep and warn the nominator as they are mass-nominating/prodding all the articles of Mr. Lama, regardless of when they were created, regardless of who else edited them, regardless of their notability and even regardless of their actual sourcing. If Mr. Lama/Giovannigiulio was ever disruptive, nomitator is being disruptive as well, possibly more. In a case like this, G5 is clearly not eligible, notability is obvious, there is no improvement for the encyclopedia from the deletion of the article, and AfD like these are just a big waste of time for the community, who has better things to do. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
information Administrator note I think we're going to have to do a history merge with Not Born to Be Gladiators. An IP appears to have performed a cut and paste move in July. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
History merge has been carried out. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook