The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Salvio giuliano 19:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of a filmmaker and musician, not
properly sourced as passing our notability criteria for filmmakers or musicians. This was created at the subject's full name, rather than his normal common name, in an apparent attempt to sidestep the results of the prior
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gino McKoy -- but it still doesn't make any particularly strong notability claim (e.g. noteworthy music or film awards) over and above the fact that he and his work exist, and it's still based on a mixture of
primary sources,
self-promotion and glancing namechecks of his existence in sources that are not about him, which is not the kind of sourcing that it takes to pass
WP:GNG in lieu of any especially noteworthy distinctions.
Just like the first time, there's still nothing here that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced considerably better than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:10, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Salvio giuliano 19:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of a filmmaker and musician, not
properly sourced as passing our notability criteria for filmmakers or musicians. This was created at the subject's full name, rather than his normal common name, in an apparent attempt to sidestep the results of the prior
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gino McKoy -- but it still doesn't make any particularly strong notability claim (e.g. noteworthy music or film awards) over and above the fact that he and his work exist, and it's still based on a mixture of
primary sources,
self-promotion and glancing namechecks of his existence in sources that are not about him, which is not the kind of sourcing that it takes to pass
WP:GNG in lieu of any especially noteworthy distinctions.
Just like the first time, there's still nothing here that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced considerably better than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:10, 10 March 2023 (UTC)