- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete under the G5 criterion. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dp210. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 06:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Gevherhan Sultan (daughter of Murad IV)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gevherhan Sultan (daughter of Murad IV) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Gevherhan Sultan
Article with no references that are both verifiable and reliable. This article appears identical to a previous article on the same person that was created in article space and moved to draft space for better sources. So there is already a draft, and this article can be deleted to allow improvement of the existing draft. The first two appear to be books, but do not identify the title (which is why the previous article was draftified). The third is a web site that is probably user-generated content. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Women,
Royalty and nobility, and
Turkey.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
00:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I see no claim of notability. Existing isn't notability. I'm happy to reconsider if someone can explain why this person is notable and prove that they are. CT55555 ( talk) 00:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. This article has no reason to exist, really. Obermallen ( talk) 03:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Wouldn't even be the first Ottoman Princess without a page so its fine. Etoilespourvous ( talk) 04:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete under the G5 criterion. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dp210. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 06:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Gevherhan Sultan (daughter of Murad IV)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gevherhan Sultan (daughter of Murad IV) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Gevherhan Sultan
Article with no references that are both verifiable and reliable. This article appears identical to a previous article on the same person that was created in article space and moved to draft space for better sources. So there is already a draft, and this article can be deleted to allow improvement of the existing draft. The first two appear to be books, but do not identify the title (which is why the previous article was draftified). The third is a web site that is probably user-generated content. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Women,
Royalty and nobility, and
Turkey.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
00:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I see no claim of notability. Existing isn't notability. I'm happy to reconsider if someone can explain why this person is notable and prove that they are. CT55555 ( talk) 00:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. This article has no reason to exist, really. Obermallen ( talk) 03:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Wouldn't even be the first Ottoman Princess without a page so its fine. Etoilespourvous ( talk) 04:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.