The result was delete. I have to admire the honesty of the one "keep" !voter for saying "yea it's not notable but keep it anyway per IAR". If somebody were to make a good logical argument for keeping an article that otherwise failed the relevant guideline(s) and it received some support then it should be given some weight but not for a BLP, sorry. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 14:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. This player is non-notable because he has never appeared in a fully-professional league (therefore failing WP:NFOOTBALL), and has not received "significant coverage", therefore failing WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 14:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I have to admire the honesty of the one "keep" !voter for saying "yea it's not notable but keep it anyway per IAR". If somebody were to make a good logical argument for keeping an article that otherwise failed the relevant guideline(s) and it received some support then it should be given some weight but not for a BLP, sorry. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 14:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. This player is non-notable because he has never appeared in a fully-professional league (therefore failing WP:NFOOTBALL), and has not received "significant coverage", therefore failing WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 14:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply