The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
speedy keep, it looks like insufficient
WP:BEFORE, the subject has
an h-index of 58 and 17k citations in the literature. Clearly passes
WP:PROF#1. --
hroest 14:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep. NPROF is one of very few SNGs that supersede GNG, so lack of SIGCOV is irrelevant here.
JoelleJay (
talk) 19:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC)reply
keep, easy pass of NPROF#1. He might also pass GNG, as there are a whole lot of results in google news with his name (mostly in German).--Eostrix (
🦉 hoothoot🦉) 15:20, 24 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Apart from WP:PROF#C1 considerations mentioned above, I believe the subject also qualifies under
WP:PROF#C7, as "The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. GoogleNews
[3] shows that his views as a medical expert, particularly in relation to COVID-19, are frequently discussed in the media in relation to public policy. GoogleNews has 600+ hits for him and I don't think any of those are false positives.
Nsk92 (
talk) 10:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
speedy keep, it looks like insufficient
WP:BEFORE, the subject has
an h-index of 58 and 17k citations in the literature. Clearly passes
WP:PROF#1. --
hroest 14:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep. NPROF is one of very few SNGs that supersede GNG, so lack of SIGCOV is irrelevant here.
JoelleJay (
talk) 19:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC)reply
keep, easy pass of NPROF#1. He might also pass GNG, as there are a whole lot of results in google news with his name (mostly in German).--Eostrix (
🦉 hoothoot🦉) 15:20, 24 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Apart from WP:PROF#C1 considerations mentioned above, I believe the subject also qualifies under
WP:PROF#C7, as "The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. GoogleNews
[3] shows that his views as a medical expert, particularly in relation to COVID-19, are frequently discussed in the media in relation to public policy. GoogleNews has 600+ hits for him and I don't think any of those are false positives.
Nsk92 (
talk) 10:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.