The result was no consensus. No consensus in any direction here, and merger discussion can be continued on the talk page. Speaking as an editor, I can't see any need to use the deletion tool here in any case, if consensus develops that this should not be its own article, a merger would be far more in line with deletion policy than a deletion. Courcelles 23:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Articles fails WP:GNG even after the sources were added. The sources are routine news stories which mention the alumni association, but do not go into depth. TM 13:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. No consensus in any direction here, and merger discussion can be continued on the talk page. Speaking as an editor, I can't see any need to use the deletion tool here in any case, if consensus develops that this should not be its own article, a merger would be far more in line with deletion policy than a deletion. Courcelles 23:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Articles fails WP:GNG even after the sources were added. The sources are routine news stories which mention the alumni association, but do not go into depth. TM 13:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC) reply