From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 01:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC) reply

George Cervantes

George Cervantes (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable volunteer and matchmaker, the author of which myself and other users have attempted to explain sourcing, tone, etc. to. He has disregarded our advice, and the sourcing in this article is either all advertorials, too sparse to be useful for this subject, or of dubious origin. BEFORE returns jack shit (string: ["George Cervantes" matchmaker]), something which the author was told last time (several months ago) and which still holds true today. Mercenary suspected; the author has consistently disclaimed any association with the subject but has edited little else. Article was created in mainspace directly by author after previous drafts were all unambiguously rejected and the previous draft - which was of similar substance and tone to this one, with virtually identical sourcing - was deleted as G11. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 21:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

They created a page COI a few days ago and I fully declared that I know Mr. Cervantes and he attends the same church where I go on Sundays. I am not getting any payment as I mentioned on the COI page that was created a few days ago. I am simply stating the facts with sources to back up anything that is on the page. -- Marcorubiocali ( talk) 21:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply
I created a new page becuase TimTrent told me to start a fresh/brand new page. I was following his advice.-- Marcorubiocali ( talk) 21:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Tim Trent's actual advice included " I wish you had not moved it to mainspace. There it is vulnerable to a deletion process. The review process would have helped you a great deal." Theroadislong ( talk) 21:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

I saw what he said after I posted the article live. It was too late then. I am sorry for that. I will let you guys decide what you are going to do with the page. That's all the information that I have for Cervantes. Thank you! -- Marcorubiocali ( talk) 21:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete – Does not satisfy general notability. A review of the references teaches as much about the matchmaking business as about the subject. The matchmaking business appears to provide a lot of vanity awards (like publishing, and like distilled spirits). The subject may be famous for being famous, but that is not clear. The subject uses social media effectively to publicize himself, and the matchmaking business publicizes its people. There are 17 references, but, on review, 0 of them are independent secondary sources. Most or all of them are interviews, or messages encouraging people to volunteer and help animals, or press releases, or vanity awards. (I meant to include this statement prior to the analysis of sources. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)}} reply
Number Reference Remarks Independent Significant Reliable Secondary
1 The Free Library Entry in a list of volunteers No No No
2 Newsbreak Volunteer message No No No
3 Globedia Volunteer listing (in Spanish) No No No
4 Argonaut News Animal Advocate, volunteer message No No No
5 Vocal Media Pet Life Interview No No
6 Daily Herald Another volunteer message No No No
7 Launchora Interview in which he criticizes his competitors No Yes No
8 Hollywood Matchmakers Interview No No
9 Best Los Angeles Matchmakers A celebrity award by the matchmaking association No No
10 Wellbeing News UK A press release, almost same as 9 No No
11 Voticle.com An interview No No
12 Weheartit Article about a celebrity award No No
13 Newsbreak Another volunteer message No No
14 DateNewYorkSingles.com Another press release about an award No No
15 Vocal Media Pet Life Publicity for the subject's organization No Yes No
16 DateManhattanSingles.com Another press release about an award No No
17 Calameo Encourages people to volunteer No No

Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 01:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC) reply

George Cervantes

George Cervantes (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable volunteer and matchmaker, the author of which myself and other users have attempted to explain sourcing, tone, etc. to. He has disregarded our advice, and the sourcing in this article is either all advertorials, too sparse to be useful for this subject, or of dubious origin. BEFORE returns jack shit (string: ["George Cervantes" matchmaker]), something which the author was told last time (several months ago) and which still holds true today. Mercenary suspected; the author has consistently disclaimed any association with the subject but has edited little else. Article was created in mainspace directly by author after previous drafts were all unambiguously rejected and the previous draft - which was of similar substance and tone to this one, with virtually identical sourcing - was deleted as G11. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 21:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

They created a page COI a few days ago and I fully declared that I know Mr. Cervantes and he attends the same church where I go on Sundays. I am not getting any payment as I mentioned on the COI page that was created a few days ago. I am simply stating the facts with sources to back up anything that is on the page. -- Marcorubiocali ( talk) 21:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply
I created a new page becuase TimTrent told me to start a fresh/brand new page. I was following his advice.-- Marcorubiocali ( talk) 21:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Tim Trent's actual advice included " I wish you had not moved it to mainspace. There it is vulnerable to a deletion process. The review process would have helped you a great deal." Theroadislong ( talk) 21:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

I saw what he said after I posted the article live. It was too late then. I am sorry for that. I will let you guys decide what you are going to do with the page. That's all the information that I have for Cervantes. Thank you! -- Marcorubiocali ( talk) 21:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete – Does not satisfy general notability. A review of the references teaches as much about the matchmaking business as about the subject. The matchmaking business appears to provide a lot of vanity awards (like publishing, and like distilled spirits). The subject may be famous for being famous, but that is not clear. The subject uses social media effectively to publicize himself, and the matchmaking business publicizes its people. There are 17 references, but, on review, 0 of them are independent secondary sources. Most or all of them are interviews, or messages encouraging people to volunteer and help animals, or press releases, or vanity awards. (I meant to include this statement prior to the analysis of sources. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)}} reply
Number Reference Remarks Independent Significant Reliable Secondary
1 The Free Library Entry in a list of volunteers No No No
2 Newsbreak Volunteer message No No No
3 Globedia Volunteer listing (in Spanish) No No No
4 Argonaut News Animal Advocate, volunteer message No No No
5 Vocal Media Pet Life Interview No No
6 Daily Herald Another volunteer message No No No
7 Launchora Interview in which he criticizes his competitors No Yes No
8 Hollywood Matchmakers Interview No No
9 Best Los Angeles Matchmakers A celebrity award by the matchmaking association No No
10 Wellbeing News UK A press release, almost same as 9 No No
11 Voticle.com An interview No No
12 Weheartit Article about a celebrity award No No
13 Newsbreak Another volunteer message No No
14 DateNewYorkSingles.com Another press release about an award No No
15 Vocal Media Pet Life Publicity for the subject's organization No Yes No
16 DateManhattanSingles.com Another press release about an award No No
17 Calameo Encourages people to volunteer No No

Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook