- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 18:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Geneva International Peace Research Institute ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is not clear why it should be relevant as an NGO. The article is short, and there are not so many links in the Internet that help understand its relevancy Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 10:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 10:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Created by prolific sockmaster User:Chaudeau. The external link goes to a non-English site. It is not clear what this is, but it is not related to the Geneva Conventions. — Maile ( talk) 13:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 18:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Geneva International Peace Research Institute ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is not clear why it should be relevant as an NGO. The article is short, and there are not so many links in the Internet that help understand its relevancy Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 10:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 10:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Created by prolific sockmaster User:Chaudeau. The external link goes to a non-English site. It is not clear what this is, but it is not related to the Geneva Conventions. — Maile ( talk) 13:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.