The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dr. Universe ( talk) 07:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
According to the discussion on WP:DRV, allowed to renominate. The previous AFD reason was vague; all the votes were also vague, almost like someone is behind it according to the vandalism/advertisement/spam edits in the history of this article. I do not want to attack as I've made mistakes too. So I'll just state the facts. These links are broken/promotional: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] Black-listed: [13] [14]. Press release: [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]. Wordpress: [20]. Plagiarism(same as wikipedia article): [21] [22].
Also, on WP:DRV, contributor who also participated in the previous AFD, suggested links that show up on Google after some promotional/spam sites. Addressing those links; Controversial information that's been removed (History of article), also points to more reason of deletion of the article. If it were reliable info, I would've edited it on the article. Controversial links: [23] [24] [25] [26]. Written with similar promotional content: [27] [28].
This shows, Geliyoo goes against WP:NOTE, WP:RS and WP:NOT. Due to WP:G11 as the article does not have independent sources and is almost advertisement even if the article has been on Wikipedia for a while. Nudgepath ( talk) 18:09, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
References
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dr. Universe ( talk) 07:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
According to the discussion on WP:DRV, allowed to renominate. The previous AFD reason was vague; all the votes were also vague, almost like someone is behind it according to the vandalism/advertisement/spam edits in the history of this article. I do not want to attack as I've made mistakes too. So I'll just state the facts. These links are broken/promotional: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] Black-listed: [13] [14]. Press release: [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]. Wordpress: [20]. Plagiarism(same as wikipedia article): [21] [22].
Also, on WP:DRV, contributor who also participated in the previous AFD, suggested links that show up on Google after some promotional/spam sites. Addressing those links; Controversial information that's been removed (History of article), also points to more reason of deletion of the article. If it were reliable info, I would've edited it on the article. Controversial links: [23] [24] [25] [26]. Written with similar promotional content: [27] [28].
This shows, Geliyoo goes against WP:NOTE, WP:RS and WP:NOT. Due to WP:G11 as the article does not have independent sources and is almost advertisement even if the article has been on Wikipedia for a while. Nudgepath ( talk) 18:09, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
References