This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Geliyoo has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
October 6, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the search engine of
Geliyoo was found to be retrieving its results from Google, in contrast to the company's claims of spending 10 million Turkish liras on development? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Before editing this article, it would be useful to know why two previous pages on the subject were deleted Chrismorey ( talk) 07:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geliyoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geliyoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow editors,
This is to notify and give report that some reliable reference links and reliable content has just been added to the page to make it look more acceptable and meet the standard English Wikipedia policy.
For more clarification, The following changes were made:
Daxhton ( talk) 10:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Caleb Stanford ( talk · contribs) 15:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
I enjoyed reading this article! I think it's in good shape and I would support GA with some edits. The edits I suggest are (1) a few more high-quality references if possible, (2) broader context about the company's size and relevance, e.g. number of employees, revenue, number of users, or other coverage/accredation by other individuals or companies.
The development was later halted due to "inadequate technology infrastructure", and a script was used to keep the domain active" (final sentence of the History section) is sufficient to describe that not much is going on at the moment. There aren't any third-party sources reporting on the blank website. Since I've already used a few primary sources in the article, I don't think adding the following text (or something similar) will do much. ~Styyx Talk? 14:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
text
|
---|
As of June 2022, the website of the search engine of Geliyoo is blank. [1] References
|
These are good improvements. Thanks. I also made a pass of some copyedits and I included the sentence above. I've requested a second opinion because I am not experienced with reviewing. Overall, I am not sure if the article currently meets GA. I looked through a few of the sources, I only had time to click on a few.
1. LA weekly source: " https://www.laweekly.com/hakan-atabas-an-entrepreneur-who-teaches-the-world-the-right-way-to-trade/" the entire article reads as self-promotion. Begins "Hakan Atabas is the genius" and the rest of the article goes on to attach just about every possible buzz word to their name. My favorite part is "Geliyoo can be classified as a product of NoSQL, JavaScript, BigData, Hadoop, and many basic constructs"
2. hurriyetdailynews source: https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/opinion/ersu-ablak/google-as-a-turkish-national-search-engine-108694 an opinion piece that begins "The news went viral". Other than this it seems OK as a primary source (though not independent coverage).
I think the lead could do better to establish notability and to be up-to-date to 2022, though as you said, there isn't good coverage of the current status of the page. That makes me wonder about notability. 52 employees is good, but market share of 0.3% is probably not notable.
...but isn't in use as of 2022, and a script is used to keep the domain of Geliyoo active instead" to the lead, Removed "Geliyoo expected to have a market share of 0.3% in October 2013". ~Styyx Talk? 18:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Caleb Stanford ( talk) 16:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
I think the article sources are good. I am concerned about the language used in the article including the lead. It may be too technical (using programmer jargon) to give the average reader a proper understanding of what actually happened. To be specific phrases such as "script is used to keep the domain of Geliyoo active instead" in the lead is unclear.-- Gazozlu ( talk) 16:21, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
I see the article still has the request for second opinion listed; I see some recent conversations, but it doesn't look as if anyone has picked up the second opinion so I am happy to provide one. Caleb, I think you just want validation that your review is sufficiently thorough? I'll take an independent look at the article, and see if I come up with anything else, and that will give you feedback. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 16:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
It is reported that [Geliyoo] will have 7% of the market share in 2018 by having 3 million users", so I assume user count.
The development was later halted due to "inadequate technology infrastructure", and a script was used to keep the domain active".
I have not spotchecked the sources yet, because I've suggested several be removed; I'll wait till that's finalized before checking sources against the article text. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 17:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Earwig shows no issues. Spotchecks:
Geliyoo'nun Kurucusu ve CEO'su Hakan Atabaş ile Kurucusu ve Ar-Ge'si Fatih Arslan'ın..." near the bottom. Interestingly, the Instagram account of Geliyoo (which is linked from their website) does the same. Pretty fucked up company.
Just the item about the founders to fix. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 11:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Last fix is good; passing. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 13:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 20:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Styyx ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC).
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi all. I came across this page reading through the engineering and technology GA pages, and think it still may need some work.
To me, the page feels like it would fit B-class. Would be great to get some community insight. SerAntoniDeMiloni ( talk) 21:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Geliyoo has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
October 6, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the search engine of
Geliyoo was found to be retrieving its results from Google, in contrast to the company's claims of spending 10 million Turkish liras on development? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Before editing this article, it would be useful to know why two previous pages on the subject were deleted Chrismorey ( talk) 07:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geliyoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geliyoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow editors,
This is to notify and give report that some reliable reference links and reliable content has just been added to the page to make it look more acceptable and meet the standard English Wikipedia policy.
For more clarification, The following changes were made:
Daxhton ( talk) 10:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Caleb Stanford ( talk · contribs) 15:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
I enjoyed reading this article! I think it's in good shape and I would support GA with some edits. The edits I suggest are (1) a few more high-quality references if possible, (2) broader context about the company's size and relevance, e.g. number of employees, revenue, number of users, or other coverage/accredation by other individuals or companies.
The development was later halted due to "inadequate technology infrastructure", and a script was used to keep the domain active" (final sentence of the History section) is sufficient to describe that not much is going on at the moment. There aren't any third-party sources reporting on the blank website. Since I've already used a few primary sources in the article, I don't think adding the following text (or something similar) will do much. ~Styyx Talk? 14:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
text
|
---|
As of June 2022, the website of the search engine of Geliyoo is blank. [1] References
|
These are good improvements. Thanks. I also made a pass of some copyedits and I included the sentence above. I've requested a second opinion because I am not experienced with reviewing. Overall, I am not sure if the article currently meets GA. I looked through a few of the sources, I only had time to click on a few.
1. LA weekly source: " https://www.laweekly.com/hakan-atabas-an-entrepreneur-who-teaches-the-world-the-right-way-to-trade/" the entire article reads as self-promotion. Begins "Hakan Atabas is the genius" and the rest of the article goes on to attach just about every possible buzz word to their name. My favorite part is "Geliyoo can be classified as a product of NoSQL, JavaScript, BigData, Hadoop, and many basic constructs"
2. hurriyetdailynews source: https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/opinion/ersu-ablak/google-as-a-turkish-national-search-engine-108694 an opinion piece that begins "The news went viral". Other than this it seems OK as a primary source (though not independent coverage).
I think the lead could do better to establish notability and to be up-to-date to 2022, though as you said, there isn't good coverage of the current status of the page. That makes me wonder about notability. 52 employees is good, but market share of 0.3% is probably not notable.
...but isn't in use as of 2022, and a script is used to keep the domain of Geliyoo active instead" to the lead, Removed "Geliyoo expected to have a market share of 0.3% in October 2013". ~Styyx Talk? 18:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Caleb Stanford ( talk) 16:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
I think the article sources are good. I am concerned about the language used in the article including the lead. It may be too technical (using programmer jargon) to give the average reader a proper understanding of what actually happened. To be specific phrases such as "script is used to keep the domain of Geliyoo active instead" in the lead is unclear.-- Gazozlu ( talk) 16:21, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
I see the article still has the request for second opinion listed; I see some recent conversations, but it doesn't look as if anyone has picked up the second opinion so I am happy to provide one. Caleb, I think you just want validation that your review is sufficiently thorough? I'll take an independent look at the article, and see if I come up with anything else, and that will give you feedback. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 16:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
It is reported that [Geliyoo] will have 7% of the market share in 2018 by having 3 million users", so I assume user count.
The development was later halted due to "inadequate technology infrastructure", and a script was used to keep the domain active".
I have not spotchecked the sources yet, because I've suggested several be removed; I'll wait till that's finalized before checking sources against the article text. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 17:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Earwig shows no issues. Spotchecks:
Geliyoo'nun Kurucusu ve CEO'su Hakan Atabaş ile Kurucusu ve Ar-Ge'si Fatih Arslan'ın..." near the bottom. Interestingly, the Instagram account of Geliyoo (which is linked from their website) does the same. Pretty fucked up company.
Just the item about the founders to fix. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 11:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Last fix is good; passing. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 13:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 20:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Styyx ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC).
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi all. I came across this page reading through the engineering and technology GA pages, and think it still may need some work.
To me, the page feels like it would fit B-class. Would be great to get some community insight. SerAntoniDeMiloni ( talk) 21:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)