The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Please don't nominate GNAA for deletion, as it has been nominated many times before with no consensus and further nominations are unlikely to end in deletion. --
Kjkolb 21:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is a nonnotable organization that Wikipedia should not recognize.
64.12.117.5 21:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Please don't nominate GNAA for deletion, as it has been nominated many times before with no consensus and further nominations are unlikely to end in deletion. --
Kjkolb 21:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is a nonnotable organization that Wikipedia should not recognize.
64.12.117.5 21:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.