The result of the debate was Early close, keep. Sorry, but this is going only one of two ways: massive pile-on keep, or massive toxicity. Eight prior keeps is more than enough, there is no realistic chance of deletion and I see no reason to waste more of the community's time. Feel free to haul me up in front of ArbCom as a rouge admin. Just zis Guy you know? 21:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Don't feed the trolls. We shouldn't have this article FireStone 16:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC) (note: this is FireStone's first edit.) Silensor 18:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC) Indeed, the nominator has been blocked indefinitely. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 18:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Early close, keep. Sorry, but this is going only one of two ways: massive pile-on keep, or massive toxicity. Eight prior keeps is more than enough, there is no realistic chance of deletion and I see no reason to waste more of the community's time. Feel free to haul me up in front of ArbCom as a rouge admin. Just zis Guy you know? 21:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Don't feed the trolls. We shouldn't have this article FireStone 16:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC) (note: this is FireStone's first edit.) Silensor 18:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC) Indeed, the nominator has been blocked indefinitely. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 18:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply