- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I've discounted the votes of sockpuppets. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 16:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
G. Suresh Kumar
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- G. Suresh Kumar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG as current article lacking reliable sources INeedToFlyForever ( talk) 12:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- This is completely not appreciable as the nominator nominated the article for deletion. As I checked the user details of the nominator and I found that a user with just a year-old on Wikipedia (Not much experienced) and has just 1000+ edits also an extended confirmed user. Does he have the right to nominate an Articles?, because most of his edits on Wikipedia is Afd and still nominating development articles for deletion. According to the article, G. Suresh Kumar is one of the tops contributed Malayalam film producers and produced about 32 films. I accept that he has not much coverage in English that is why I had put a stub on the article and seek help to expand it. There are media coverages in regional languages also the IMDb. You can also check Revathy Kalamandhir which is his production banner. While improving the articles, Nominating the article for deletion is so disappointing and that kind of practice might affect the editor's interest in Wikipedia. Instead of nominating for deletion, he can try to improve the article. He nominated the article because it lacks source, but he can add a citation tag instead of doing it. I request to keep the article -Author- Ambili123 ( talk) 12:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. INeedToFlyForever ( talk) 12:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete: No significant coverage from the sources. Being the producer of 32 films doesnt guarantee anyone a wikipedia article. One should satisfy WP:GNG or any other subject related notability criteria to get an independent article. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Striking comments by blocked sockpuppet: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sulshanamoodhi. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- @
Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla: Could you please explain the coverage of the article
T. P. Madhavan (only 6 references cited, first one is not working, also cited facebook. Rest of them are not covering his notability.. then why did not take a nomination to get it deleted ?? Is that still falling under GNG? I suspect the nominator and
User:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla are closely connected. Suspecting Sockupuppetry.
Ambili123 (
talk)
11:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Ambili123 T. P. Madhavan has acted in more than 600 films which makes him pass WP:NACTOR. Could you explain how G. Suresh Kumar passes NACTOR or WP:FILMMAKER. BTW if you think Im a sock of the nominator, open an SPI rather than accussing me for it here. It is considered as a form of personal attack. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 20:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Striking comments by blocked sockpuppet: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sulshanamoodhi. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)- @ Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla: You don’t need to be worried. Nobody is attacking you personally. If I suspect you, definitely I will report it to the admins. Leave it!!
- @
Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla: Could you please explain the coverage of the article
T. P. Madhavan (only 6 references cited, first one is not working, also cited facebook. Rest of them are not covering his notability.. then why did not take a nomination to get it deleted ?? Is that still falling under GNG? I suspect the nominator and
User:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla are closely connected. Suspecting Sockupuppetry.
Ambili123 (
talk)
11:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
You told that he acted 600 films and I also know that he passes WP:NACTOR, but where is the reliable sources ? You said in case of G Suresh Kumar that it fails GNG, that’s why I wondered. As you are a Keralite, you also know him, If don’t please try to know about him, he haven't much english coverages. I have collected his informations from IMDb as well as other sources. Also he acted in 21 films as an actor. His production house is there on Wikipedia then why you two are opposing him. We know about him like you do in case of T.P Madhavan sir, also why you don't take actions against unesassary articles from this industry!! Do it!! Thank you. I'm not warring!! I'm just sharing the thoughts. How some impossible things are possible to someone!! Ambili123 ( talk) 20:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Ambili123, There are millions of articles in en-wik. Im not a WIKIGOD to identify the unnecessary articles and I dont have time for it. I only voted here because I came across it. And you are taking things to a wrong path here. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 20:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Striking comments by blocked sockpuppet: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sulshanamoodhi. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla, INeedToFlyForever It is ok leave it. Please check the article now and let me know please, I have updated some more details. Please do the needful. Ambili123 ( talk) 07:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 ( talk) 01:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 ( talk) 01:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 01:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 01:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is a notable producer who has contributed significantly to malayalam films, instead of deleting this page, more creation needs.
Priyatungi ( talk) 04:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This appears to be notable and should be retained. Advait ( talk) 08:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Added some reliable sources and now they passes both WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG 007sak ( talk) 09:34, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I've discounted the votes of sockpuppets. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 16:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
G. Suresh Kumar
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- G. Suresh Kumar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG as current article lacking reliable sources INeedToFlyForever ( talk) 12:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- This is completely not appreciable as the nominator nominated the article for deletion. As I checked the user details of the nominator and I found that a user with just a year-old on Wikipedia (Not much experienced) and has just 1000+ edits also an extended confirmed user. Does he have the right to nominate an Articles?, because most of his edits on Wikipedia is Afd and still nominating development articles for deletion. According to the article, G. Suresh Kumar is one of the tops contributed Malayalam film producers and produced about 32 films. I accept that he has not much coverage in English that is why I had put a stub on the article and seek help to expand it. There are media coverages in regional languages also the IMDb. You can also check Revathy Kalamandhir which is his production banner. While improving the articles, Nominating the article for deletion is so disappointing and that kind of practice might affect the editor's interest in Wikipedia. Instead of nominating for deletion, he can try to improve the article. He nominated the article because it lacks source, but he can add a citation tag instead of doing it. I request to keep the article -Author- Ambili123 ( talk) 12:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. INeedToFlyForever ( talk) 12:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete: No significant coverage from the sources. Being the producer of 32 films doesnt guarantee anyone a wikipedia article. One should satisfy WP:GNG or any other subject related notability criteria to get an independent article. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Striking comments by blocked sockpuppet: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sulshanamoodhi. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- @
Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla: Could you please explain the coverage of the article
T. P. Madhavan (only 6 references cited, first one is not working, also cited facebook. Rest of them are not covering his notability.. then why did not take a nomination to get it deleted ?? Is that still falling under GNG? I suspect the nominator and
User:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla are closely connected. Suspecting Sockupuppetry.
Ambili123 (
talk)
11:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Ambili123 T. P. Madhavan has acted in more than 600 films which makes him pass WP:NACTOR. Could you explain how G. Suresh Kumar passes NACTOR or WP:FILMMAKER. BTW if you think Im a sock of the nominator, open an SPI rather than accussing me for it here. It is considered as a form of personal attack. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 20:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Striking comments by blocked sockpuppet: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sulshanamoodhi. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)- @ Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla: You don’t need to be worried. Nobody is attacking you personally. If I suspect you, definitely I will report it to the admins. Leave it!!
- @
Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla: Could you please explain the coverage of the article
T. P. Madhavan (only 6 references cited, first one is not working, also cited facebook. Rest of them are not covering his notability.. then why did not take a nomination to get it deleted ?? Is that still falling under GNG? I suspect the nominator and
User:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla are closely connected. Suspecting Sockupuppetry.
Ambili123 (
talk)
11:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
You told that he acted 600 films and I also know that he passes WP:NACTOR, but where is the reliable sources ? You said in case of G Suresh Kumar that it fails GNG, that’s why I wondered. As you are a Keralite, you also know him, If don’t please try to know about him, he haven't much english coverages. I have collected his informations from IMDb as well as other sources. Also he acted in 21 films as an actor. His production house is there on Wikipedia then why you two are opposing him. We know about him like you do in case of T.P Madhavan sir, also why you don't take actions against unesassary articles from this industry!! Do it!! Thank you. I'm not warring!! I'm just sharing the thoughts. How some impossible things are possible to someone!! Ambili123 ( talk) 20:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Ambili123, There are millions of articles in en-wik. Im not a WIKIGOD to identify the unnecessary articles and I dont have time for it. I only voted here because I came across it. And you are taking things to a wrong path here. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 20:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Striking comments by blocked sockpuppet: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sulshanamoodhi. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla, INeedToFlyForever It is ok leave it. Please check the article now and let me know please, I have updated some more details. Please do the needful. Ambili123 ( talk) 07:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 ( talk) 01:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 ( talk) 01:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 01:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 01:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is a notable producer who has contributed significantly to malayalam films, instead of deleting this page, more creation needs.
Priyatungi ( talk) 04:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This appears to be notable and should be retained. Advait ( talk) 08:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Added some reliable sources and now they passes both WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG 007sak ( talk) 09:34, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.