- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- G. George Addonizio ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Biography, sourced half to raw tables of election results and half to passing namechecks in news articles in which he was not the principal subject, of a person notable only as a smalltown municipal councillor and as a non-winning candidate for higher office. These are not claims of notability that get a person over WP:NPOL — municipal councillors get Wikipedia articles if they serve in major metropolitan global cities and/or can be sourced well enough to pass WP:GNG, and non-winning candidates for office get Wikipedia articles only if you can qualify them for Wikipedia articles on some other criterion completely independent of their candidacy. But neither of those has been shown here. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 20:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 20:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
'Deleteper nom. Legacypac ( talk) 09:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete failed candidates for US house even if they have a major party nomination are not notable for that alone. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- G. George Addonizio ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Biography, sourced half to raw tables of election results and half to passing namechecks in news articles in which he was not the principal subject, of a person notable only as a smalltown municipal councillor and as a non-winning candidate for higher office. These are not claims of notability that get a person over WP:NPOL — municipal councillors get Wikipedia articles if they serve in major metropolitan global cities and/or can be sourced well enough to pass WP:GNG, and non-winning candidates for office get Wikipedia articles only if you can qualify them for Wikipedia articles on some other criterion completely independent of their candidacy. But neither of those has been shown here. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 20:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 20:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
'Deleteper nom. Legacypac ( talk) 09:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete failed candidates for US house even if they have a major party nomination are not notable for that alone. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.