From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Fuat Ergin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article simply announces the rapper's existence and makes no statement of notability. This is probably because he has received almost no significant and reliable media coverage, and is only visible in the standard retail and streaming databases. The same is true of his various alternate stage names. None of his albums have reliable or informative reviews either, and are themselves only available at the standard retail and streaming sites. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment from Nominator - Just because the publication (newspaper) is notable, this does not guarantee that the article about the person under discussion is significant or helps with notability. Of the five newspaper articles listed: #1 and #4 are possibly useful for info about the rapper's history, but they are softball introductory interviews. #2 is nothing but a brief promotional announcement. #3 is a brief notice about the guy's wedding. #5 is a PR piece about an upcoming album. In my view, none of those satisfy the significant coverage requirement for this musician despite being reliable publications otherwise. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Fuat Ergin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article simply announces the rapper's existence and makes no statement of notability. This is probably because he has received almost no significant and reliable media coverage, and is only visible in the standard retail and streaming databases. The same is true of his various alternate stage names. None of his albums have reliable or informative reviews either, and are themselves only available at the standard retail and streaming sites. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment from Nominator - Just because the publication (newspaper) is notable, this does not guarantee that the article about the person under discussion is significant or helps with notability. Of the five newspaper articles listed: #1 and #4 are possibly useful for info about the rapper's history, but they are softball introductory interviews. #2 is nothing but a brief promotional announcement. #3 is a brief notice about the guy's wedding. #5 is a PR piece about an upcoming album. In my view, none of those satisfy the significant coverage requirement for this musician despite being reliable publications otherwise. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook