The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:NFILM. Google finding very few sources.
noq (
talk) 11:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - Confirming my PROD, "Fails
WP:NFILM and I could not find any reviews in
WP:RS". Appears to be being edited by the filmmaker himself.
shoy (
reactions) 12:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: I found it difficult to believe that film (even a short film) receiving
multiple awards (even if not seen as "major" as an Oscar) had received absolutely no coverage. In a quick look, I easily found an in-depth independent review
by James McDonald at Irish Film Critic. I have convinced myself it is worth looking further before declaring them non-existent. At the very least, the author should be sent to
WP:NAU to better understand the difficulties of
WP:COI when editing. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment that link is a dup of
[1] that is already on the article.
noq (
talk) 22:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Yes, and it is the original review of which the article ref was itself a dup. I still support a deeper search. Schmidt, Michael Q. 17:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)reply
WP:NFILM specifies a "major award". Any organization can make trophies and give them out.
shoy (
reactions) 12:45, 12 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Ah, that's an
"attribute to consider" which suggests that "sources may exist" and is not itself a mandate when it clarifies "Standards have not yet been established to define a major award, but it's not to be doubted that an Academy Award, or Palme D'or, Camera D'or, or Grand Prix from Cannes would certainly be included. Many major festivals such as Venice or Berlin should be expected to fit our standard as well"... essentially telling us that awards (even non-major) hint that coverage may exist. This is why I suggested Looking deeper. Simple. Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as even the comment above stating the links are still quite thin and are not coming close to the actual needed substance, let alone information, because all what's the listed here are some film show appearances.
SwisterTwistertalk 00:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as a
non-notable short film. The
sources are weak, to say the least. Other than showing at mid-level film festivals, I don't see any evidence this has ever been shown in a regular movie theater, much less an "indie house". Unless a short film is shown at the Cannes Court Métrage or some similar high-profile shorts-fest or a World SF Con, it's unlikely to get much media attention. Furthermore, none of the actors are
notable yet.
Bearian (
talk) 18:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:NFILM. Google finding very few sources.
noq (
talk) 11:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - Confirming my PROD, "Fails
WP:NFILM and I could not find any reviews in
WP:RS". Appears to be being edited by the filmmaker himself.
shoy (
reactions) 12:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: I found it difficult to believe that film (even a short film) receiving
multiple awards (even if not seen as "major" as an Oscar) had received absolutely no coverage. In a quick look, I easily found an in-depth independent review
by James McDonald at Irish Film Critic. I have convinced myself it is worth looking further before declaring them non-existent. At the very least, the author should be sent to
WP:NAU to better understand the difficulties of
WP:COI when editing. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment that link is a dup of
[1] that is already on the article.
noq (
talk) 22:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Yes, and it is the original review of which the article ref was itself a dup. I still support a deeper search. Schmidt, Michael Q. 17:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)reply
WP:NFILM specifies a "major award". Any organization can make trophies and give them out.
shoy (
reactions) 12:45, 12 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Ah, that's an
"attribute to consider" which suggests that "sources may exist" and is not itself a mandate when it clarifies "Standards have not yet been established to define a major award, but it's not to be doubted that an Academy Award, or Palme D'or, Camera D'or, or Grand Prix from Cannes would certainly be included. Many major festivals such as Venice or Berlin should be expected to fit our standard as well"... essentially telling us that awards (even non-major) hint that coverage may exist. This is why I suggested Looking deeper. Simple. Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as even the comment above stating the links are still quite thin and are not coming close to the actual needed substance, let alone information, because all what's the listed here are some film show appearances.
SwisterTwistertalk 00:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as a
non-notable short film. The
sources are weak, to say the least. Other than showing at mid-level film festivals, I don't see any evidence this has ever been shown in a regular movie theater, much less an "indie house". Unless a short film is shown at the Cannes Court Métrage or some similar high-profile shorts-fest or a World SF Con, it's unlikely to get much media attention. Furthermore, none of the actors are
notable yet.
Bearian (
talk) 18:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.