From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to French Canadians.  Sandstein  16:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply

French Canada (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is about "the Francophone population of Canada" which is already covered much more extensively (and verifiably) at French Canadians. Geography is covered extensively at Canada and New France among others. Language is covered at French language in Canada. Subsequently, this article page does not serve any purpose. trackratte ( talk) 15:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete Per nom, info ont he page can be found elsewhere in WP. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 16:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

There's a separate standalone article about almost every individual province's or territory's francophone community (except the Maritimes, where they're all subsumed into Acadian rather than having separate provincial identity communities, and Nunavut). Bearcat ( talk) 01:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Off the top of my head, the term "French Canada" would be a reasonable search term for French Canadians, Quebec and other parts of New France in what is now Canada (such as Acadia), and Francophone Canada, which is a redirect to French language in Canada.-- Cúchullain t/ c 02:50, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
French Canada could possibly refer collectively to all the regions of Canada where francophones reside (although I don't recall it ever being used that way), but definitely not individual areas like Acadia. Clarityfiend ( talk) 10:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply
It can and does refer to the parts of Canada that were French colonies, which includes Acadia (meaning, not just present-day Quebec). It's a similar construction to French Louisiana, Spanish California, Mexican Texas, etc.-- Cúchullain t/ c 13:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply
By what definition of "all the regions of Canada where francophones reside" is Acadia not one of those regions? Bearcat ( talk) 16:15, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • I agree that this isn't useful as a standalone article, as there's nothing it can really cover that isn't already covered in French Canadian and its various spinoff pages — but it is too common a phrase to simply be left redlinked, and indeed needs to get the reader somewhere relevant. Even though potential items do exist besides Quebec to make it a dab page (e.g. Franco-Ontarian, Acadians, Franco-Manitoban, French language in Canada, etc.), all of those are also linked in French Canadians already. The best solution, accordingly, is indeed a redirect to French Canadians — the only other alternative, really, would be to turn it into a full-on outline index of all remotely related pages, and that's probably excessive. Bearcat ( talk) 01:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 01:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to French Canadians.  Sandstein  16:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply

French Canada (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is about "the Francophone population of Canada" which is already covered much more extensively (and verifiably) at French Canadians. Geography is covered extensively at Canada and New France among others. Language is covered at French language in Canada. Subsequently, this article page does not serve any purpose. trackratte ( talk) 15:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete Per nom, info ont he page can be found elsewhere in WP. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 16:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

There's a separate standalone article about almost every individual province's or territory's francophone community (except the Maritimes, where they're all subsumed into Acadian rather than having separate provincial identity communities, and Nunavut). Bearcat ( talk) 01:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Off the top of my head, the term "French Canada" would be a reasonable search term for French Canadians, Quebec and other parts of New France in what is now Canada (such as Acadia), and Francophone Canada, which is a redirect to French language in Canada.-- Cúchullain t/ c 02:50, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
French Canada could possibly refer collectively to all the regions of Canada where francophones reside (although I don't recall it ever being used that way), but definitely not individual areas like Acadia. Clarityfiend ( talk) 10:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply
It can and does refer to the parts of Canada that were French colonies, which includes Acadia (meaning, not just present-day Quebec). It's a similar construction to French Louisiana, Spanish California, Mexican Texas, etc.-- Cúchullain t/ c 13:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply
By what definition of "all the regions of Canada where francophones reside" is Acadia not one of those regions? Bearcat ( talk) 16:15, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • I agree that this isn't useful as a standalone article, as there's nothing it can really cover that isn't already covered in French Canadian and its various spinoff pages — but it is too common a phrase to simply be left redlinked, and indeed needs to get the reader somewhere relevant. Even though potential items do exist besides Quebec to make it a dab page (e.g. Franco-Ontarian, Acadians, Franco-Manitoban, French language in Canada, etc.), all of those are also linked in French Canadians already. The best solution, accordingly, is indeed a redirect to French Canadians — the only other alternative, really, would be to turn it into a full-on outline index of all remotely related pages, and that's probably excessive. Bearcat ( talk) 01:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 01:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook