- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawing due to explanation below. Mdann52 ( talk) 14:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Frederick Achom
- Frederick Achom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Suspected hoax reported on my talk page, rational was "I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article Frederick Achom, at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night OwlsLondon's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article." Mdann52 ( talk) 07:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep: User:Mdann52, suggest withdrawing nomination and closing. London Evening Standard is a sufficiently reliable newspaper for the purpose, and the "Night Owls" is a subcategory of identified notable Londoners. Subject has notability, whatever the deficiencies of the article, and the article is under discussion for repair at Talk:Frederick_Achom#Completely_False_Article_Frederick_Achom, where User:NihartouJason is now proposing an alternative version in Draft. Cheers ~~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~~ 07:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 08:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 08:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawing due to explanation below. Mdann52 ( talk) 14:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Frederick Achom
- Frederick Achom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Suspected hoax reported on my talk page, rational was "I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article Frederick Achom, at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night OwlsLondon's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article." Mdann52 ( talk) 07:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep: User:Mdann52, suggest withdrawing nomination and closing. London Evening Standard is a sufficiently reliable newspaper for the purpose, and the "Night Owls" is a subcategory of identified notable Londoners. Subject has notability, whatever the deficiencies of the article, and the article is under discussion for repair at Talk:Frederick_Achom#Completely_False_Article_Frederick_Achom, where User:NihartouJason is now proposing an alternative version in Draft. Cheers ~~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~~ 07:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 08:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 08:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.