This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2020 June 8. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 08:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Completely fails WP:N and WP:V, with all of the sources in this bundle having at most a primary source and certainly no secondary or tertiary sources whatsoever. Even were they to, though, I'd argue that these articles are not suitable encyclopedic content anyway; they may well be original research, and the lists certainly don't meet WP:LISTPEOPLE.
This nomination bundle includes the articles below as well, for the exact same set of reasons:
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2020 June 8. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 08:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Completely fails WP:N and WP:V, with all of the sources in this bundle having at most a primary source and certainly no secondary or tertiary sources whatsoever. Even were they to, though, I'd argue that these articles are not suitable encyclopedic content anyway; they may well be original research, and the lists certainly don't meet WP:LISTPEOPLE.
This nomination bundle includes the articles below as well, for the exact same set of reasons: